Reducing Black Box Region in ESBMV: A Comparative Study of Frequency and Spatial Compounding

Abstract

Black Box Regions (BBRs), which represent a significant degradation of Eigenspace Based Minimum Variance (ESBMV) ultrasound imaging, occur mainly due to the result of phase decoherence and acoustic attenuation of heterogeneous media. These artefacts obscure clinically relevant anatomical features and thus destroy diagnostic precision. Although adaptive beamforming has advanced significantly, focused approaches for systematic BBR mitigation are still poorly examined. Accordingly, the current investigation assesses the restorative efficiency of non- multiplicative compounding techniques, namely Frequency Compounding (FC) and Spatial Compounding (SC), in reducing BBR artefacts. Performance assessment was done using Field II simulations and experimental phantom data measured by Speckle Signal minus Noise Ratio (SSNR) and Contrast to Noise Ratio (CNR). Findings prove that SC significantly outperforms FC in restoring the signal integrity of BBRs. By introducing angular diversity, SC effectively decorrelates speckle, especially at moderate steering angles. Conversely, while FC allows somewhat enhanced contrast improvement, the ability of the method to recover signal in areas of low coherence is limited. Collectively, these results show that incorporating SC into the ESBMV framework provides a powerful tool to reduce BBR artefacts and dramatically improve image fidelity for complex clinical applications.

Country : Iraq

1 Afnan Asaad2 Zainab R. Alomari

  1. Communication Engineering Department, College of Electronics Engineering, University of Ninevah, Mosul, Iraq
  2. Communication Engineering Department, College of Electronics Engineering, University of Ninevah, Mosul, Iraq

IRJIET, Volume 10, Issue 2, February 2026 pp. 19-30

doi.org/10.47001/IRJIET/2026.102004

References

  1. B. M. Asl and A. Mahloojifar, “Eigenspace-based minimum variance beamforming applied to medical ultrasound imaging,” IEEE Transactions on Ultrasonics, Ferroelectrics, and Frequency Control, vol. 57, no. 11, pp. 2381–2390, 2010.
  2. H. Hasegawa, “Image quality assessment and challenges in modern ultrafast ultrasound imaging,” Journal of Medical Ultrasonics, vol. 51, no. 1, pp. 1–15, 2024.
  3. O. M. H. Rindal, A. Rodriguez-Molares, and A. Austeng, “The dark region artifact in adaptive ultrasound beamforming,” in Proc. IEEE Int. Ultrasonics Symp. (IUS), 2017, pp. 1–4.
  4. P.-C. Li and M.-L. Li, "Adaptive imaging using the generalized coherence factor," IEEE transactions on ultrasonics, ferroelectrics, and frequency control, vol. 50, no. 2, pp. 128-141, 2003.
  5. R. Mallart and M. Fink, "The van Cittert–Zernike theorem in pulse echo measurements," The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, vol. 90, no. 5, pp. 2718-2727, 1991.
  6. X. Zeng, C. Chen, and Y. Wang, "Eigenspace-based minimum variance beamformer combined with Wiener postfilter for medical ultrasound imaging," Ultrasonics, vol. 52, no. 8, pp. 996-1004, 2012.
  7. Y. Wang, C. Zheng, H. Peng, and X. Chen, “Short-lag spatial coherence combined with ESBMV beamformer for synthetic aperture ultrasound imaging,” Computers in Biology and Medicine, vol. 91, pp. 267–276, 2017.
  8. Z. Rami Alomari, Plane Wave Imaging Beamforming Techniques for Medical Ultrasound Imaging, Ph.D. Thesis, University of Leeds, 2017.
  9. Z. Lan, C. Zheng, Y. Wang, H. Peng, and H. Qiao, “Adaptive threshold for ESBMV beamformer for dark region artifacts elimination,” IEEE Transactions on Instrumentation and Measurement, vol. 70, pp. 1–16, 2021.
  10. J. Zhao, Y. Wang, J. Yu, W. Guo, T. Li, and Y.-P. Zheng, “Adaptive subarray coherence–based postfilter for eigenspace-based minimum variance beamforming in plane-wave imaging,” Ultrasonics, vol. 139, 2024.
  11. X. Li, P. Wang, and Q. Li, “Frequency-domain eigenspace projection minimum variance beamforming for ultrasound imaging,” in Proceedings of the IEEE Signal Processing in Medicine and Biology Symposium (SPMB), 2025.
  12. C.-C. Shen, C.-H. Chen, and S.-L. Chen, “Improvement in multi-angle plane-wave image quality using delay-multiply-and-sum beamforming,” Sensors, vol. 24, no. 2, 2024.
  13. J.-F. Synnevåg, A. Austeng, and S. Holm, “Benefits of minimum-variance beamforming in medical ultrasound imaging,” IEEE Transactions on Ultrasonics, Ferroelectrics, and Frequency Control, vol. 56, no. 9, pp. 1868–1879, 2009.
  14. Y. Li, Y. Winetraub, O. Liba, A. de la Zerda, and S. Chu, “Optimization of the trade-off between speckle reduction and axial resolution in frequency compounding,” IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging, vol. 38, no. 1, pp. 107–112, 2018.
  15. X. Wu, Q. Gao, M. Lu, T. Wang, and S. Chen, “An improved spatio-temporally smoothed coherence factor combined with ESBMV beamformer for plane-wave imaging,” in Proceedings of the IEEE International Ultrasonics Symposium (IUS), 2017, pp. 1–4.
  16. W. Wang, Q. He, Z. Zhang, and Z. Feng, “Adaptive beamforming using deep neural networks for ultrafast ultrasound imaging,” Ultrasonics, vol. 126, p. 106823, 2022.
  17. G. Montaldo et al., "Coherent plane-wave compounding for very high frame rate ultrasonography," IEEE Trans. UFFC, 2009.
  18. P. N. T. Wells, "Ultrasonic imaging of the human body," Reports on Progress in Physics, 2006.
  19. J. Zhao et al., "Objective Image Quality Assessment for Adaptive Ultrasound Beamforming: Metrics and Benchmarks," IEEE Access, vol. 12, pp. 45210-45225, 2024.
  20. S. J. Kim and M. L. Oelze, "Quantitative Assessment of Lateral Resolution and Mainlobe Properties in Advanced Beamforming," Ultrasound in Medicine & Biology, vol. 49, no. 8, pp. 1842-1856, 2023.
  21. M. Jakovljevic et al., "Contrast-to-Noise Ratio Re-evaluated in the Era of Modern Ultrasound Beamforming," IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging, vol. 41, no. 5, pp. 1105-1118, 2022.
  22. A.Rodriguez-Molares et al., "The Ultrasound Beamforming Toolbox: A Modern Framework for Image Quality Assessment," IEEE Transactions on UFFC, vol. 68, no. 6, pp. 2100-2115, 2021.
  23. J. A. Jensen, "Field II: A Program for Simulating Ultrasound Systems," Medical & Biological Engineering & Computing, vol. 34, pp. 351-353, 1996. [Online]. Available: https://field-ii.dk/
  24. Sun Nuclear (CIRS), "Multi-Purpose, Multi-Tissue Ultrasound Phantom Model 040GSE," Technical Specifications, 2023. [Online]. Available: https://www.sunnuclear.com/products/multi-purpose-multi-tissue-ultrasound-phantom
  25. H. Liebgott, A. Rodriguez-Molares, et al., "Plane-Wave Imaging Challenge in Medical Ultrasound (PICCmus)," IEEE International Ultrasonics Symposium (IUS), 2016. [Online]. Available: https://www.creatis.insa-lyon.fr/Challenge/IEEE_IUS_2016/
  26. “IEEE Data Repository – Carotid Artery Plane-Wave Dataset,” IEEE Xplore, 2016. [Online]. Available: https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/abstract/document/7728908
  27. H.  ALHAJI and A. Y.  Taqa, “Leveraging GANs and Vision Transformers for Text-to-Image Synthesis”, Iraqi Journal of Science, vol. 67, no. 1, pp. 524–537, Jan. 2026, doi: 10.24996/ijs.2026.67.1.41.