Characterization of Flexible Concrete Incorporating (GGBS) and Met kaolin as Supplementary Cementitious Materials

Abstract

Conventional Portland cement concrete, though ubiquitous in infrastructure construction, exhibits inherent brittleness characterized by low tensile strength and limited strain capacity, typically failing catastrophically at microstrains of 100–200. The progressive deterioration of concrete structures due to cracking under service loads, thermal cycling, and dynamic forces necessitates the development of innovative cementitious composites with enhanced deformation capacity. This research investigates the development and characterization of flexible concrete incorporating Ground Granulated Blast Furnace Slag (GGBS) and Metakaolin (MK) as supplementary cementitious materials (SCMs) in an M30 grade concrete matrix, targeting a minimum flexural strain capacity in the range of 500–800 microstrains. The experimental program was designed to systematically evaluate the influence of partial cement replacement by GGBS (20%, 30%, and 40% by weight of binder) and Metakaolin (5%, 10%, and 15% by weight of binder), individually and in binary combination, on the fresh properties, mechanical strength, and flexural ductility of concrete. A total of eighteen mix proportions, including a control mix, were evaluated. Specimens were prepared and tested in accordance with applicable Indian Standards, including IS 10262:2019, IS 516:1959 (Reaffirmed 2018), IS 5816:1999, and IS 1786:2008. Test results demonstrated that optimized binary blends of 30% GGBS and 10% Metakaolin yielded compressive strengths of approximately 34.2 MPa at 28 days, meeting the M30 performance criterion while exhibiting a flexural strain capacity of 672 microstrains—well within the target range. The incorporation of SCMs refined the pore structure, enhanced the interfacial transition zone (ITZ), and promoted secondary pozzolanic reactions, collectively contributing to improved toughness and crack-arrest mechanisms. Strain energy density values were computed from load-deflection data, revealing a 58% enhancement over the control mix in optimized specimens. Results were analyzed using analysis of variance (ANOVA) and scanning electron microscopy (SEM) to correlate microstructural attributes with macroscopic behaviour. 

Country : India

1 Eesha Gill2 Dr. Rajwinder Singh Bansal

  1. Research Scholar, Ramgarhia Institute of Engineering & Technology, Punjab, India
  2. Head & Associate Professor, Ramgarhia Institute of Engineering & Technology, Punjab, India

IRJIET, Volume 10, Issue 3, March 2026 pp. 29-34

doi.org/10.47001/IRJIET/2026.103006

References

  1. Neville, A.M.: Properties of Concrete, 4th Edition, Longman Group Ltd., London. Neville's foundational text established the theoretical basis for understanding concrete brittleness, fracture mechanics, and the role of the interfacial transition zone in controlling mechanical behaviour.
  2. Li, V.C., "Engineered Cementitious Composites — Tailored Composites Through Micromechanical Modeling," Fiber Reinforced Concrete: Present and the Future, Canadian Society for Civil Engineering. This seminal paper introduced the micromechanical framework for designing Engineered Cementitious Composites (ECC) with tensile strain capacities exceeding 3–5%.
  3. Wild, S., Khatib, J.M., and Jones, A. (1996.) Wild, S., Khatib, J.M., and Jones, A., "Relative strength, pozzolanic activity and cement hydration in superplasticised metakaolin concrete," Cement and Concrete Research, 26(10), 1537–1544..
  4. Baker, A. T., & Alexander, M. G. (2019). Use of metakaolin as supplementary cementitious material in concrete with focus on durability properties. RILEM Technical Letters.
  5. Cleetus, C. S., & Kumar, R. (2024). Assessing the effects of supplementary cementitious materials on concrete properties: A review. Discover Civil Engineering. Springer.
  6. Doğan, M. (2024). Durability of non-heat-cured geopolymer mortars containing Metakaolin and GGBFS. Minerals, 14(8), 776.
  7. Kumar, D., & Daniyal, M. (2025). Application of industrial supplementary cementitious materials in concrete: A review. Journal of Civil Engineering and Applications, 6(1), 126–135.