Determination of Energy Consumption Balance and Overconsumption Analysis for Smart Homes

Abstract

The long range needs and the tiny data size required for transmission, IoT is ideal for smart grid deployment. A novel remote energy monitoring system is now possible using narrow-band RF, the industry standard for long-range communication. The Internet connectivity module is connected to the home system's main supply unit and may be accessed over the Internet. The static IP address is utilized for wireless connection. Home automation is built on a multimodal application that may be controlled via the Google Assistant's speech recognition feature or a web-based application. As a result, the primary goal of our project is to make our home automated. Wireless energy meters with hardware for remote monitoring of electrical equipment, M2M connectivity (LORA, SIGFOX, 3G/GPRS), and web services to handle the gathered data make up the solution (history, alerts, graphs, statistics, etc.). This IoT solution makes network setup and installation easier for end users, lowers infrastructure costs (no repeaters), and is generally interoperable with current solutions. The most common use of energy monitoring is to determine energy consumption balance and over consumption analysis in order to pinpoint the areas that need to be repaired. 

Country : India

1 Rajkumar Chunchu

  1. Associate Professor, Department of Electronics and Communication Engineering, Malla Reddy College of Engineering for Women, Hyderabad -500100, Telangana, India

IRJIET, Volume 2, Issue 5, July 2018 pp. 38-42

.

References

  1. Damacharla, A. Y. Javaid, J. J. Gallimore and V. K. Devabhaktuni, ”Common Metrics to Benchmark Human-Machine Teams (HMT): A Review,” in IEEE Access, vol. 6, pp. 38637-38655, 2018.
  2. O. Benderius, C. Berger and V. Malmsten Lundgren, ”The Best Rated HumanMachine Interface Design for Autonomous Vehicles in the 2016 Grand Cooperative Driving Challenge,” in IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems, vol. 19, no. 4, pp. 1302-1307,April 2018
  3. Z. Xu, R. Wang, X. Yue, T. Liu, C. Chen and S. Fang, ”FaceME: Face-to-Machine Proximity Estimation Based on RSSI Difference for Mobile Industrial HumanMachine Interaction,” in IEEE Transactions on Industrial Informatics, vol. 14, no. 8, pp. 3547-3558, Aug. 2018.
  4. S. Ziegler, S. Nikoletsea, S. Krco, J. Rolim and J. Fernandes, ”Internet of Things and crowd sourcing - a paradigm change for the research on the Internet of Things,” 2015 IEEE 2nd World Forum on Internet of Things (WF-IoT), Milan, 2015, pp. 395-399.
  5. J. Voas, B. Agresti and P. A. Laplante, ”A Closer Look at IoT ’s Things,” in IT Professional, vol. 20, no. 3, pp. 11-14, May./Jun. 2018.
  6. Q. F. Hassan, ”Introduction to the Internet of Things,” in Internet of Things A to Z: Technologies and Applications , IEEE, 2018.
  7. S. Singh and N. Singh, ”Internet of Things (IoT): Security challenges, business opportunities & reference architecture for E-commerce,” 2015 International Conference on Green Computing and Internet of Things (ICGCIoT), Noida, 2015, pp. 1577-1581.
  8. M. Shinde and R. R. Dube, “IOT Based Energy Monitoring and Management System for Smart Homes,” International Journalof Recent Trends in Engineering and Research, vol. 4, no. 1, pp. 287–295, 2018.
  9. M. Daneshvar, M. Pesaran, and B. Mohammadi-Ivatloo, “Transactive energy in future smart homes,” in The Energy Internet, pp. 153–179, Elsevier, 2018.