Structural Dynamic Behavior of Turbo Generator Foundation Connected with Passive Supplemental Damping Devices

Abstract

Study the dynamic properties of Turbo-Generator foundation with and without passive supplemental damping are considered in this paper using finite element method. The high vibrations of machines especially Turbo-Generators machines lead to use massive masses of foundations to absorb the big amount of dynamic loads generated by machines. The work in this paper investigates the effect of using passive supplemental damping devices such as lead rubber bearings to accommodate these big amount of dynamic loads, also investigates how it could lead to change the dynamic responses of Turbo-Generator foundations to be in the safe frequency range with less masses and better dynamic performance. The analysis of the system with and without supplemental damping devices is performed which shows the significant effect of using damping devices. The results show that damping devices could lead to decrease masses of top deck of the machine foundation by 20% with acceptable dynamic responses compared with foundations without supplemental damping devices. A proof of the high significant of damping devices especially lead rubber bearings in decreasing the construction cost and changing the dynamic behavior of Turbo-generator machine foundation is presented by performing a detailed comparison study with and without damping devices.

Country : Egypt

1 Mohamed Adel2 Yassr Alzeni3 Ahmed Ghalab

  1. M.Sc. Graduate Student, Structural Engineering Dept., Faculty of Engineering, Ain Shams University, Cairo, Egypt
  2. Assistant Professor, Structural Engineering Dept., Faculty of Engineering, Alexandria University, Alexandria, Egypt
  3. Professor Doctor, Structural Engineering Dept., Faculty of Engineering, Ain Shams University, Cairo, Egypt

IRJIET, Volume 3, Issue 5, May 2019 pp. 42-52

References

  1. Bhatia, K. G. (2008). Foundations for industrial machines and earthquake effects.
  2. Nawrotzki, P., Hüffmann, G., &Uzunoglu, T. (2008). Static and dynamic analysis of concrete turbine foundations. Structural Engineering International, 18(3), 265-270.
  3. Jayarajan P., Kouzer K.M. (2014). Dynamic analysis of Turbo-generator Machine Foundation. Journal of Civil Engineering and Environmental Technology.
  4. Adhikari (2003). S. Turbo generator foundation II.
  5. IS 456. (2000). Plain and reinforced concrete–code of practice. Indian Standard, ICS, 91.100. 30, New Delhi.
  6. ACI Committee, & International Organization for Standardization. (2008). Building code requirements for structural concrete (ACI 318-08) and commentary. American Concrete Institute.
  7. IS 2974-1 (1982). Code of practice for design and construction of machine foundations.
  8. Seo, J., Hu, J. W., & Lee, J. (2015). Summary review of structural health monitoring applications forhighway bridges. Journal of Performance of Constructed Facilities, 30(4), 04015072.
  9. Morgan, T., Whittaker, A. S., & Thompson, A. (2001, October). Cyclic behavior of high-damping rubber bearings. In Proceedings.
  10. Vu, T. D., Kim, D., & Cho, S. G. (2013). Updating of Analytical Model to Consider Aging Effects of Lead-Rubber Bearings for the Seismic Design of Base-Isolated Nuclear Power Plants. Nuclear Technology, 182(1), 75-83.
  11. IOf, S. (2009). ISO 10816-7: Mechanical vibration - evaluation of machine vibration by measurements on non-rotating parts.
  12. DIN 4024-1 (1988). Machine foundations; flexible structures that support machines with rotating elements.
  13. DIN 4024-2 (1988). Machine foundations; rigid foundations for machinery with periodic excitation.