Impact Factor (2025): 6.9
DOI Prefix: 10.47001/IRJIET
Surface and groundwater extraction has been used to satisfy the rising
demand of water in developing countries which is unsustainable. Rainwater
harvesting systems is progressively becoming a sustainable water management
measure. However, an assessment of their feasibility in small and large
buildings is required for considerable investment cost and payback periods. In
this study, Raincycle model was used to describe and analyse the different
criteria for sizing a rainwater harvesting system. Raincycle model was used to
size the storage tank, cost savings of tanks and choose optimum size.
Behavioural (or simulation) analysis was included to compute the changes in
storage content of a finite reservoir. To apply this method, three case studies
were used: a residential apartment, office and hospital blocks. Result reveals
a tank size of 4 m3, 10 m3 and 12 m3 could
meet the maximum percentage of demand and predicted to save $259, $2,564, and
$51,072 over 50 years for case studies 1, 2 and 3 respectively. A payback
period of 21 years, 8 years and 1 year was recorded for the three case studies,
respectively. This study also shows that the implementation of a rainwater
harvesting system in a residential dwelling is not a feasible investment in
terms of economic savings as it presents payback time that is not feasible. The
office and hospital blocks present a payback time that is considered feasible
as payback time is reached during the building’s lifetime.
Country : Nigeria / United Kingdom
IRJIET, Volume 4, Issue 11, November 2020 pp. 11-19