Procedural Issues in a Mixed Methods Research: A Phenomenological Study of a Doctoral Student in Lesotho

Abstract

This paper narrates some lived experiences of a doctoral student in using a mixed-methods sequential explanatory design. Study was conducted to layout the procedural issues followed in a mixed method research from the researcher’s point of view. Data was first collected and analysed quantitatively using and followed by collecting and analysing qualitative data in two consecutive phases within one study or in a single study. Drawing from this paper, definition of a mixed methods approach followed by outlined procedural issues or mixed methods dimensions in using the mixed methods sequential explanatory design are discussed. These procedural issues include: 1) implementation (timing) of mixed methods approach, which is the sequence in which data was collected  2) rationale for using mixed-methods approach 3) priority or weight given to an approach for analysis, 4) the stage of integration in the research process at which the quantitative and qualitative data are consolidated. Finally, this paper offers a comprehensive explanation of challenges of adapting the mixed-methods sequential explanatory design. It is hoped that this paper is used to enrich the understanding of researchers and students on philosophical underpinnings that help in adapting mixed methods in their own studies.

Country : Lesotho

1 Mamosa Thaanyane

  1. National University of Lesotho, Department of Language and Social Education, Maseru, Lesotho

IRJIET, Volume 5, Issue 6, June 2021 pp. 92-95

doi.org/10.47001/IRJIET/2021.506017

References

  1. Armitage, A. 2009. Mutual research design: Redefining mixed-methods research design. Essex.
  2. Bryman, A. 2006. Paradigm peace and the implications for quality. International Journal of Social Research Methodology, 9, 111–126.
  3. Bryman, A. 2006a. Integrating quantitative and qualitative research: How is it done? Qualitative Research, 6, 97-113.
  4. Creswell, CW & Clark, PV. 2018. Designing and conducting mixed methods research. 3rd edition. SAGE. London.
  5. Creswell, CW. 2014. Research design. 3rd edition. SAGE. London.
  6. Creswell, JW & Creswell, JD. 2018. Research Design: Qualitative, Quantitative and Mixed methods Approaches. 5th edition. SAGE Publications India Pvt. Ltd. London.
  7. Feilza, M. 2010. Doing Mixed Methods Research Pragmatically: Implications for the Rediscovery of Pragmatism as a Research Paradigm. Journal of Mixed Methods Research. XX(X) 1–11  
  8. Greene, J. 2007. Mixed methods in social inquiry. San Francisco, CA. Jossey-Bass.
  9. Guest, G & Fleming, P. 2015. Mixed methods research. Journal of Mixed Methods Research. 581-606
  10. Hesse-Biber, S. 2010. Mixed methods research: Merging theory with practice. New York, NY: Guilford Press.
  11. MacMillan, JH. & Schumacher, S. 2010. Research in Education: Evidence-Based
  12. Mason, J. 2002. Qualitative Researching. London: SAGE.
  13. Morgan, D. 2014. Integrating qualitative and quantitative methods: A pragmatic approach. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
  14. Morse, J & Niehaus, L. 2009. Mixed method design: Principles and procedures. Walnut Creek, CA: Left Coast Press.
  15. Nataliya V,  Ivankova & Sheldon L. Stick. 2007. Students' persistence in a distributed doctoral program in educational leadership in higher education: A mixed methods study. Research in Higher Education, 48(1):93-135.
  16. Teddlie, C & Tashakkori, A. 2009. Foundations of mixed methods research: Integrating quantitative and qualitative approaches in the social and behavioral sciences. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.