Influence of the Primary and Secondary Lower Leg War Amputations on the Length of Hospitalization and Rehabilitation

Abstract

Objective: To analyze the influence of war amputations on the rehabilitation length we have tried to find a correlation between different stages of the rehabilitation process and the kind of amputation that has been performed.

Methods: Therefore we have analyzed the data of 36 patients with knee amputation due to war injuries. The average age was 35.42 years. Most patients were wounded by explosive land mines (94.4%), others by projectiles. In 2.8% of cases there was a bilateral amputation.

Results: The limb was amputated on the day when the injury (primary amputation) occurred in 30 patients (83.3%). Secondary amputation after an attempt to save a severely injured limb was performed in 6 patients (16.7%), on average 4.61 ± 11.67 days after injury. Reamputation was necessary in 6 cases (16.7%). The average length of time between rehabilitation to the fitting of prosthetics, was for primary amputations 36.25 ± 14.97 days, in secondary 32 ± 17.8 days, and in reamputations 68.66 ± 33.52 days.

Conclusion: There is no statistically significant correlation between the duration of rehabilitation to prosthetics fitting and time between injury and amputation (r = -0.102). Attempt to save the limb in severe lower leg war injuries and secondary amputation thereafter did not significantly affect the later course of rehabilitation and prosthetic fitting.

Country : Bosnia and Herzegovina

1 Zlata Jelacic

  1. University of Sarajevo, Faculty of Mechanical Engineering, Department of Biomechanics, Vilsonovo šetalište 9, 71000 Sarajevo, Bosnia and Herzegovina

IRJIET, Volume 6, Issue 1, January 2022 pp. 88-90

doi.org/10.47001/IRJIET/2022.601016

References

  1. Dagum AB, Best AK, Schemisch EH, Mahoney JL, Mahomed MN, Blight KR. Salvage after severe lower-extremity trauma: are the outcomes worth the means? Plast Reconstr Surg 1999; 103: 1212Þ20.
  2. Kegel B, Carpenter ML, Burgess EM. A survey of lowerlimb amputees: prostheses phantom sensations, and psychosocial aspects. Bull Prosthet Res 1977; 10: 43Þ60.
  3. Kegel B, Carpenter ML, Burgess EM. Functional capabilities of lower extremity amputees. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 1978; 59: 109Þ20.
  4. Matsen SL, Malchow D, Matsen FA 3rd. Correlations with patients' perspectives of the Result of Lower-Extremity Amputation. J Bone Joint Surg 2000; 82-A,(8) 1089-95.
  5. Simper LB. Below knee amputation in war surgery: a review of 111 amputations with delayed primary closure. J Trauma 1993; 34: 96Þ8.
  6. Stewart CP, Jain AS. Dundee revisited-25 years of a total amputee service. Prosthet orthot Int 1993; 17: 14-20.