Establishing the State of Ethnic Conflict and Governance in Jonglei State, South Sudan

Abstract

This study was set to establish the state of Ethnic conflict and Governance in Jonglei State, South Sudan. It was guided by the following specific objectives, that included determining the (i) profile of respondents, (i) To establish the state of Ethnic conflict, (ii) to examine the extent of governance and (iii) To establish whether there is a relationship between Ethnic Conflict and governance in Jonglei, South Sudan. The study adopted a descriptive survey design .it used questionnaires, face to face interviews. The target population was 220 from which a sample size of 140 was derived. Findings revealed that respondents between 25-35 year were 32.1%, Female respondents dominated the study (64.3%); married were (53.6%) other marital status category; Secondary Certificate holders dominated the study 50% and on occupation others dominated the entire sample size with 54.2%. The findings on Ethnic conflict revealed that eight items were measured and rated as follows; cattle grazing and raids (Average mean=2.43, std .99116) Environmental conflicts (Average mean=2.50, std 1.02221), ethnic security dilemma (Average mean=2.64, std. 1.08997) Disarmament and grab of power (Average mean=2.41 std. .99248), state political capacity (Average mean=2.18 std. 1.03375) religious issues (Average mean= 2.25 std.  .85146) and abduction (Average mean=2.49 std .63617) with an overall mean of 2.41).

The findings on Governance revealed that seven items were measured and rated as follows; Public participation and Democracy (Average mean=3.06, std .74603) Legislative branch (Average mean=2.83, std .59523), Executive and rule of Law (Average mean=2.92 std. .70057) Traditional & customary arrangement (Average mean=2.78 std. .68791), Transparency and accountability (Average mean=2.80 std. .72664)  Human Security (Average mean= 2.81 std.  .59522) with an overall mean of 2.87). Regarding  ethnic conflict, it was recommended that; Equitable sharing of resources, Strengthening local administration, Empowerment of traditional leadership, Government to treat all communities equally,  Governor visit all communities regularly, Provision of judges and public prosecutors; construction of courts in the counties,  Upgrading of unqualified civil servants through capacity-building, compensation of salaries to chiefs. While  issues  of  inclusive governance and equity are important  drivers  of conflict, these statements highlight complex and  in  some cases long-standing  governance-related  issues which largely went beyond  the  mandate of the peace conference. Political accommodation approach tackles governance issues directly.

Regarding governance it was recommended that; if power sharing is to be done to the satisfaction of all different ethnic, religious, caste, tribal and linguistic identities, millions of people would have to be accommodated in various state structures. Hence, power sharing does not seem to offer any viable solution at all. Also inculcate regional autonomy and federation into the state system to enable local and regional authorities with a degree of autonomous power and authority. Allow external intervention to find a solution to their internal conflicts like those of the Nuer tribals, and Dinka. External interventions have two primary effects. Intervention can alter the internal balance of ethnic power and lead groups to moderate their demands. Provide guarantees for new ethnic contracts between the warring parties, at least during an interim period.

Demobilized persons should be equipped with skills agriculture, carpentry, blacksmith and modern ways of livestock farming which will improve their livelihoods; the government should also compensate the families that have been affected by cattle raids and use all forces to recover the children and women who had been abducted. Further recommends awareness to the local population on the dangers of illegal arms in the area and possession of illegal fire arms. The peaceful disarmament to the local population that will help in restoration and peaceful co-existence of peace in the area is also very important. In conclusion, the preservation of ethnic peace is dependent upon the type and effectiveness of the available conflict management mechanisms and also the respective government's policy choices and decisions. Secondly, the use of constitutional conflict management tools has the potential to create lasting peace. This was more evident in Jonglei, where the government created the foundation for a thriving civil society, accountability and government transparency.

Country : Uganda/United Kingdom

1 Joseph Gibril Isaac Lomeri2 Musoke Matthew3 Hassan Abdulle Hassan

  1. College of Higher Degrees and Research (CHDR), Kampala International University, P.O. Box 20000 Kampala, Uganda
  2. School of Graduate Studies and Research (SGSR), Team University, P.O. Box 8128 Mengo, Kabaka A’njagala Road, Kampala, Uganda
  3. University of Liverpool, P.O. Box L 693 BX, United Kingdom

IRJIET, Volume 6, Issue 11, November 2022 pp. 1-11

doi.org/10.47001/IRJIET/2022.611001

References

  1. Abdi, S. (2013). Central Africa crisis:. Sudan: Jonglei State.
  2. Agbor, Julius, Olumide Taiwo (2012). Managing ethnic diversity. In: Brookings Institution, South Sudan: One year after independence: Opportunities and obstacles for Africa’s newest country.
  3. Agence France Pres (2014). 50,000 and not counting: South Sudan’s war dead.
  4. Arvind, G. (2004). Engine of war: Resources, greed, and the predatory state. Human Rights and Armed Conflict (Human Rights Watch), pp. 301-23.
  5. Auty, R.M., (1993). Sustaining Development in Mineral Economies: The Resource Curse Thesis. Routledge, London.
  6. Bariyo, N. (2015). South Sudan’s Economy Dragged Down by War, Report. Updated.
  7. Barnett, Jon, and W. Neil Adger (2007). “Climate Change, Human Security and Violent Conflict.” Political Geography 26.
  8. Bieber, Florian (2001). "Challenge of Democracy in Divided Societies: Lessons from Bosnia-- Challenges for Kosovo". Reconstructing Multiethnic Societies: The Case of Bosnia-Hercegovina. Ashgate Press. pp. 109–121.
  9. Blagojevic, Bojana (2009). “Causes of Ethnic Conflict: A Conceptual Framework.” Journal of Global Change and Governance 3.1.
  10. Bob, Urmilla and Salome Bronkhorst (2004).  Environmental conflicts:  Key issues and management implications. In: Spillmann, Kurt R. and Gunter Bachler eds. Environment and Conflicts Project.
  11. Brosché, Johan and Emma Elfversson (2012). Communal conflict, civil war, and the state: Complexities, connections, and the case of Sudan. African Journal on Conflict Resolution, 12 (1), pp. 33-56.
  12. Carl, O. (2013). Gunshots ring out in South Sudan capital after ‘attempted coup”. Reuters.
  13. Collier, P. (2004). The challenge of reducing the global incidence of civil war. Copenhagen Consensus Challenge Paper.
  14. Conca, K., (2002). The Case for Environmental Peacemaking. (eds. Conca, K. and Dabelko, G.D.), pp 1-22. Woodrow Wilson Centre Press, Washington, D.C.
  15. Copnall, J. (2013). South Sudan sees ‘mass ethnic killings’.