Design Concept Selection via Fuzzy TOPSIS

Abstract

This article describes the assessment of design concepts in order to identify the optimal concept before detail design and fabrications can be carried out. The task of identifying the design features and sub features necessary or required for optimal performance of the design is achievable by virtue of undergoing the concept selection process. In this article, concept selection via fuzzy TOPSIS method is carried out. Various design features and sub features necessary for optimal performance of a pipe bending machine was identified and the fuzzy TOPSIS model was applied to identify the optimal design from a set of alternative designs of the pipe bending machine. The decision process considered the weights of the design features which has a role to play in the final values obtained from the decision. The application to pipe bending machine shows that fuzzy TOPSIS is a practicable tool for assessing design concepts.

Country : Nigeria

1 Oloye Charles Olatunji

  1. Mechanical Engineering Technology Department Rufus Giwa Polytechnic, Owo, Ondo State, Nigeria

IRJIET, Volume 7, Issue 10, October 2023 pp. 145-153

doi.org/10.47001/IRJIET/2023.710019

References

  1. AffulDadzie, E., S. Nabareseh, Z. K. Oplatková and P. Klímek (2016). "Model for assessing quality of online health information: A fuzzy VIKOR based method." Journal of MultiCriteria Decision Analysis 23(1-2): 49-62.
  2. Akay, D., O. Kulak and B. Henson (2011). "Conceptual design evaluation using interval type-2 fuzzy information axiom." Computers in Industry 62(2): 138-146.
  3. Aryanezhad, M. B., M. Tarokh, M. Mokhtarian and F. Zaheri (2011). "A fuzzy TOPSIS method based on left and right scores." International Journal of Industrial Engineering and Production Research Volume 22(issue 1): 51-62.
  4. Balin, A., H. Demirel and F. Alarcin (2016). "A novel hybrid MCDM model based on fuzzy AHP and fuzzy TOPSIS for the most affected gas turbine component selection by the failures." Journal of Marine Engineering & Technology 15(2): 69-78.
  5. Derelöv, M. (2009). On Evaluation of Design Concepts: Modelling Approaches for Enhancing the Understanding of Design Solutions, Linköping University Electronic Press.
  6. Girod, M., A. Elliott, N. D. Burns and I. Wright (2003). "Decision making in conceptual engineering design: an empirical investigation." Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part B: Journal of Engineering Manufacture 217(9): 1215-1228.
  7. Hambali, A., S. Sapuan, N. Ismail and Y. Nukman (2009). "Application of analytical hierarchy process in the design concept selection of automotive composite bumper beam during the conceptual design stage." Scientific Research and Essays 4(4): 198-211.
  8. Madi, E. N., J. M. Garibaldi and C. Wagner (2015). A comparison between two types of Fuzzy TOPSIS Method. 2015 IEEE International Conference on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics, IEEE.
  9. Matin, H. Z., M. R. Fathi, M. K. Zarchi and S. Azizollahi (2011). "The application of fuzzy TOPSIS approach to personnel selection for Padir Company, Iran." Journal of management Research 3(2): 1-14.
  10. Mattson, C. A. and A. Messac (2003). "Concept selection using s-Pareto frontiers." AIAA journal 41(6): 1190-1198.
  11. Mokhtarian, M. (2011). "A new fuzzy weighted average (FWA) method based on left and right scores: An application for determining a suitable location for a gas oil station." Computers & Mathematics with Applications 61(10): 3136-3145.
  12. Mokhtarian, M. and A. Hadi-Vencheh (2012). "A new fuzzy TOPSIS method based on left and right scores: An application for determining an industrial zone for dairy products factory." Applied Soft Computing 12(8): 2496-2505.
  13. Okudan, G. E. and R. A. Shirwaiker (2006). A multi-stage problem formulation for concept selection for improved product design. 2006 Technology Management for the Global Future-PICMET 2006 Conference, IEEE.
  14. Olabanji, O. M. (2018). "Reconnoitering the suitability of fuzzified weighted decision matrix for design process of a reconfigurable assembly fixture." International Journal of Design Engineering 8(1): 38-56.
  15. Olabanji, O. M. (2020). "Fuzzified Synthetic Extent Weighted Average for Appraisal of Design Concepts." International Journal of Research in Industrial Engineering Vol. 9(No. 2): 190-208.
  16. Olabanji, O. M. (2022). "Improving the Computational Process for Identifying Optimal Design Using Fuzzified Decision Models." International Journal of Fuzzy System Applications IGI Global 11(1): 1-21.
  17. Olabanji, O. M. and K. Mpofu (2014). Comparison of weighted decision matrix, and analytical hierarchy process for CAD design of reconfigurable assembly fixture. Procedia CIRP. 23: 264-269.
  18. Olabanji, O. M. and K. Mpofu (2019). "Decision Analysis for Optimal Design Concept: Hybridized Fuzzified Weighted Decision Matrix and Fuzzy TOPSIS Using Design for X Tools." Procedia CIRP 84: 434-441.
  19. Olabanji, O. M. and K. Mpofu (2020a). "Pugh matrix and aggregated by extent analysis using trapezoidal fuzzy number for assessing conceptual designs." Decision Science Letters 9(1): 21-36.
  20. Olabanji, O. M. and K. Mpofu (2020b). "Fusing Multi-Attribute Decision Models for Decision Making to Achieve Optimal Product Design." Foundations of Computing and Decision Sciences 45.
  21. Olabanji, O. M. and K. Mpofu (2020c). "Hybridized fuzzy analytic hierarchy process and fuzzy weighted average for identifying optimal design concept." Heliyon, Elsevier 6(1): 1-13.
  22. Olabanji, O. M. and K. Mpofu (2021). "Appraisal of conceptual designs: Coalescing fuzzy analytic hierarchy process (F-AHP) and fuzzy grey relational analysis (F-GRA)." Results in Engineering 9: 100194.
  23. Wang, J. (2001). "Ranking engineering design concepts using a fuzzy outranking preference model." Fuzzy sets and systems 119(1): 161-170.
  24. Wang, J. (2002). "Improved engineering design concept selection using fuzzy sets." International Journal of Computer Integrated Manufacturing 15(1): 18-27.