International Research Journal of Innovations in Engineering and Technology - IRJIET International Open Access, Monthly, Peer Reviewed, Reputed Journal ISSN (online): 2581-3048

Impact Factor (2025): 6.9

DOI Prefix: 10.47001/IRJIET

Developing an Optimal Strategy to Address the Vulnerability of Image Tampering

Abstract

Image tampering is a growing concern in numerous fields, necessitating robust solutions. This study investigates the creation of an optimal strategy to resolve the vulnerability of image tampering (manipulation). Beginning with a survey of contemporary alteration detection techniques, their strengths and limitations in identifying manipulated image regions are evaluated. The complexity of both global and local manipulation is highlighted, highlighting the need for multifaceted analysis. Combining conventional image forensics techniques with advanced machine learning algorithms, the devised strategy forms a comprehensive framework. This synthesis seeks to produce a robust and adaptable method capable of detecting corruption even in the presence of sophisticated manipulation techniques. The significance of a diverse training dataset is highlighted, lending credibility to the evaluation of the strategy. Real-world interference scenarios and diverse image formats enhance its dependability and generalization capabilities. Ethical considerations are interwoven to ensure a balanced approach that protects both the privacy rights of individuals and the authenticity of images. The paper concludes with empirical evidence demonstrating the effectiveness of the proposed strategy. Comparisons with extant techniques highlight its prowess, revealing improvements in precision, efficiency, and resiliency. The road ahead entails continuous improvement via learning mechanisms and adaptation to oppose emergent tampering methods. This research represents a significant advance in the field of image forensics. It strengthens digital image security, authenticity, and trustworthiness by presenting the optimal strategy. In turn, this enables more informed decision-making across various sectors, paving the way for a more reliable digital landscape.

Country : Sri Lanka

1 Isuranga Nipun Kumara2 Umal Anuraga Nanumura3 Theneth Sanjuka4 Kanishka Yapa

  1. Cybersecurity Researcher, Department of Computer Systems Engineering, Sri Lanka Institute of Information Technology, Malabe, Sri Lanka
  2. Cybersecurity Researcher, Department of Computer Engineering, University of South Wales, South Wales, United Kingdom
  3. Cybersecurity Undergraduate, Department of Computer Systems Engineering, Sri Lanka Institute of Information Technology, Malabe, Sri Lanka
  4. Lecturer, Department of Computer Systems Engineering, Sri Lanka Institute of Information Technology, Malabe, Sri Lanka

IRJIET, Volume 7, Issue 11, November 2023 pp. 511-519

doi.org/10.47001/IRJIET/2023.711067

Full Paper
Download

References

  1. R. G. Mani, R. Parthasarathy, S. Eswaran, and P. Honnavalli, “A Survey on Digital Image Forensics: Metadata and Image forgeries,” CEUR Workshop Proc., vol. 3142, pp. 22–55, 2022.
  2. C. Shen, M. Kasra, and J. F. O’brien, “Research note: This photograph has been altered: Testing the effectiveness of image forensic labeling on news image credibility,” Harvard Kennedy Sch. Misinformation Rev., vol. 2, no. 3, 2021, doi: 10.37016/mr-2020-72.
  3. S. Ferreira, M. Antunes, and M. E. Correia, “Exposing manipulated photos and videos in digital forensics analysis,” J. Imaging, vol. 7, no. 7, 2021, doi: 10.3390/jimaging7070102.
  4. F. Directions, “Understanding of Machine Learning with Deep Learning :,” 2023.
  5. W. Hilal, S. A. Gadsden, and J. Yawney, “Financial Fraud: A Review of Anomaly Detection Techniques and Recent Advances,” Expert Syst. Appl., vol. 193, p. 116429, 2022, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2021.116429.
  6. M. Aria, M. Hashemzadeh, and N. Farajzadeh, “QDL-CMFD: A Quality-independent and deep Learning-based Copy-Move image forgery detection method,” Neurocomputing, vol. 511, pp. 213–236, 2022, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neucom.2022.09.017.
  7. Z. Akhtar, “Deepfakes Generation and Detection: A Short Survey,” J. Imaging, vol. 9, no. 1, 2023, doi: 10.3390/jimaging9010018.
  8. P. Sharma, M. Kumar, and H. Sharma, “Comprehensive analyses of image forgery detection methods from traditional to deep learning approaches: an evaluation,” Multimed. Tools Appl., vol. 82, no. 12, p. 18117, 2023, doi: 10.1007/S11042-022-13808-W.
  9. B. Bayar and M. C. Stamm, “A deep learning approach to universal image manipulation detection using a new convolutional layer,” IH MMSec 2016 - Proc. 2016 ACM Inf. Hiding Multimed. Secur. Work., pp. 5–10, 2016, doi: 10.1145/2909827.2930786.
  10. E. G. Fernández, A. L. S. Orozco, L. J. G. Villalba, and J. Hernandez-Castro, “Digital image tamper detection technique based on spectrum analysis of CFA artifacts,” Sensors, vol. 18, no. 9, pp. 1–18, 2018, doi: 10.3390/s18092804.
  11. K. D. Kadam, S. Ahirrao, and K. Kotecha, “Efficient Approach towards Detection and Identification of Copy Move and Image Splicing Forgeries Using Mask R-CNN with MobileNet V1,” Comput. Intell. Neurosci., vol. 2022, 2022, doi: 10.1155/2022/6845326.
  12. S. Walia, K. Kumar, S. Agarwal, and H. Kim, “Using XAI for Deep Learning-Based Image Manipulation Detection with Shapley Additive Explanation,” Symmetry (Basel)., vol. 14, no. 8, 2022, doi: 10.3390/sym14081611.
  13. D. M. Uliyan, H. A. Jalab, A. W. A. Wahab, and S. Sadeghi, “Image region duplication forgery detection based on angular radial partitioning and harris key-points,” Symmetry (Basel)., vol. 8, no. 7, 2016, doi: 10.3390/sym8070062.
  14. X. Zhang, Y. Chen, L. Hu, and Y. Wang, “The metaverse in education: Definition, framework, features, potential applications, challenges, and future research topics,” Front. Psychol., vol. 13, no. October, pp. 1–18, 2022, doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.1016300.
  15. R. D. Kenderdine, “Wavelet-based resampling techniques,” Bull. Aust. Math. Soc., vol. 85, no. 2, pp. 351–352, 2012, doi: 10.1017/S0004972711003303.
  16. H. Jang and J. U. Hou, “Exposing digital image forgeries by detecting contextual abnormality using convolutional neural networks,” Sensors (Switzerland), vol. 20, no. 8, 2020, doi: 10.3390/s20082262.
  17. M. Rana and M. Bhushan, “Machine learning and deep learning approach for medical image analysis: diagnosis to detection,” Multimed. Tools Appl., vol. 82, no. 17, pp. 26731–26769, 2023, doi: 10.1007/s11042-022-14305-w.
  18. A. R. Javed, Z. Jalil, W. Zehra, T. R. Gadekallu, D. Y. Suh, and M. J. Piran, “A comprehensive survey on digital video forensics: Taxonomy, challenges, and future directions,” Eng. Appl. Artif. Intell., vol. 106, p. 104456, 2021, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engappai.2021.104456.
  19. J. F. Chen, Z. J. Fu, W. M. Zhang, X. Cheng, and X. M. Sun, “Review of Image Steganalysis Based on Deep Learning,” Ruan Jian Xue Bao/Journal Softw., vol. 32, no. 2, pp. 551–578, 2021, doi: 10.13328/j.cnki.jos.006135.
  20. C. Iakovidou, M. Zampoglou, S. Papadopoulos, and Y. Kompatsiaris, “Content-aware detection of JPEG grid inconsistencies for intuitive image forensics,” J. Vis. Commun. Image Represent., vol. 54, pp. 155–170, 2018, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvcir.2018.05.011.
  21. X. Wei, Y. Wu, F. Dong, J. Zhang, and S. Sun, “Developing an image manipulation detection algorithm based on edge detection and faster R-CNN,” Symmetry (Basel)., vol. 11, no. 10, pp. 1–14, 2019, doi: 10.3390/sym11101223.
  22. A. D. Torres, H. Yan, A. H. Aboutalebi, A. Das, L. Duan, and P. Rad, “Patient facial emotion recognition and sentiment analysis using secure cloud with hardware acceleration,” Comput. Intell. Multimed. Big Data Cloud with Eng. Appl., pp. 61–89, Jan. 2018, doi: 10.1016/B978-0-12-813314-9.00003-7.

Copyright @ 2026-2017 IRJIET. All Right Reserved.

Developed by Byzero Technologies