Technological and Organoleptic Properties of Tomato (Lycopersicum esculentum) Produced on Soilless Substrates in Daloa (Haut Sassandra Region, Côte d'Ivoire)

Abstract

The present study was carried out to characterise tomatoes produced on soilless substrates (cocoa, sawdust, cashew and rice husk) and to evaluate their impact on the technological and organoleptic characteristics of the tomato. A tomato crop was grown on these different substrates for three months. The tomato fruits from each substrate were subjected to chemical, technological and sensory analysis. The tomatoes of the different substrates have a high water content (94.83-96.37%). Regarding the technological properties, the results recorded are for saccharin index (1.15%), saccharin coefficient (121.5%) and acidity coefficient (8.29%). The sensory study of the tomatoes reveals that the tasters perceived sensory differences between the tomatoes. Their overall perception of the tomatoes confirms their good acceptability. Also taste, colour, shape and consistency are important criteria of fresh tomatoes. At the end of this study, it was found that the C100 substrate presented the best physicomorphological parameters. Technologically, tomatoes from the RB5050 and B100 substrates can be recommended for industrial processing.

Country : côte d'ivoire

1 Diomande Masse2 Gnahe Dago Andre3 Yeo Mohamed Anderson

  1. Laboratory of Agro Valorisation, Department of Biochemistry and Microbiology, Jean Lorougnon Guédé University, (Daloa, Côte d
  2. Laboratory of Agro Valorisation, Department of Biochemistry and Microbiology, Jean Lorougnon Guédé University, (Daloa, Côte d
  3. Central Laboratory, Department of Agronomy and Forestry, Man University, (Man, Côte d’Ivoire)

IRJIET, Volume 7, Issue 3, March 2023 pp. 93-101

doi.org/10.47001/IRJIET/2023.703013

References

  1. Chougar S. (2011) Bioecology of the tomato leafminerTutaabsoluta (MEYRICK, 1917) (Lepidoptera: Gelechiidae) on three greenhouse tomato varieties (Zahara, dawson and tivara) in the wilaya of Tizi-Ouzou. Mémoire de Magister, UniversitéMaloudMammeri de Tizi-Ouzou, Algérie, 122p.
  2. Dorais M. &Ehret D.L. (2008). Agronomy and the nutritional quality of fruit. In Barberan F.T. and Gil M.I. (eds.). Improving the health-promoting properties of fruits and vegetable products.Woodhead Publishing Ltd, 14: 346-391.
  3. Abidi L., Snoussi S.A. &Bradea M.S. (2017). Variation of brix level under the effect of a biofertilizer. U.P.B. Scientific Bulletin, 79(1): 136-144.
  4. Surh Y.J. & Na H.K. (2008).NF-kB and Nrf2 as prime molecular targets for chemoprevention and cytoprotection with anti-inflammatory and antioxidant phytochemicals. Genes & Nutrition, 2: 313-317.
  5. Abir M., Hannachi C and Zid E. (2006) - In vitro regeneration of tomato (Lycopersicomesculentum Mill.) plants adapted to Na Cl. Tropicultura, 24: 221-228.
  6. Toufouti Z.H. (2013). Contribution to the study of bacterial diseases of tomato (Lycopersicumesculentum Mill) grown in greenhouses in eastern Algeria. Master thesis, University of Constantine, Algeria, 89 p.
  7. Sangaré A., Koffi E., Akamou F. & Fall C.A. (2009). State of the phythogenetic resources for food and agriculture: Second national report. Ministry of Agriculture of Côte d'Ivoire.FAO Information Note, 63 p.
  8. Soro S., Doumbia M., Dao D., Tschannen A. &Girardin O. (2007). Performance of six tomato cultivars Lycopersiconesculentum Mill.against leaf spoon yellows, bacterial wilt and root-knot nematodes. Science and Nature, 4(2): 123-130.
  9. Dorais M. (2007). Organic production of vegetables: State of the art and challenges. Canadian Journal of Plant Science, 87 : 1055-1066.
  10. Bakker N., Dubbeling M., Gündel S., Sabel-Koschella U., & De Zeeuw H. (2000). Growing cities, growing food: urban agriculture on the policy agenda, a reader on urban agriculture. Feldafing, Des Etc, Germany.
  11. Bernier P (2015). Towards the construction of a critical discourse of commercial urban rooftop greenhouse agriculture.
  12. Fondio L., Djidji A. H., N'guessan M. F. &Tahouo O. (2013). Soilless agriculture to produce quality vegetables in urban areas of Ivory Coast, 52 p.
  13. N'Guessan A.H., N'Guessan K.F., Kouassi K.P., Kouamé N.N. &N'Guessan. P.W. (2014). Population dynamics of the cocoa stem borer, Eulophonotusmyrmeleon. 45 Felder (Lepidoptera: Cossidae) in the Haut-Sassandra region of Côte d'Ivoire. Journal of APPLIED Bioscience, 83: 7606-7614.
  14. Groga Noel, Diomande Massé, Beugre Grah Avit Maxwell, Ouattara Yaya, Akaffou Doffou Selastique (2018). Comparative study of the quality of Anabaena azolla, Azollacaroliniana symbiosis, compost and NPK on vegetative growth and yield of tomato (Lycopersiconesculentum mill.Solanaceae) in Daloa (Ivory Coast).Journal of Applied Biosciences 129: 13004 -13014. ISSN 1997-5902.
  15. AOAC (1995). Official methods of Analysis of AOAC International, 16th ed. Method 970.12.Association of Official Analytical Chemists International, (USA Washington), DC.
  16. Namestnikov A. F. (1974). Canned food quality; Pich. Prom, Moscow; pp. 133-162.
  17. Verxhivker A. & Galkina S. N. (1993). Tomato processing technology: technical guide; Ourojaï; Kiev. pp. 4-8.
  18. Granges A., Azodanlou R., Cotter P.Y., Dorsaz A., Mercier A. & Tschabold J.L. (2000). COST Action 915: Improving the quality of fruit and vegetables adapted to consumer needs. Module l: Tomato. Federal Research Station for Plant Production Changins, Centre d'arboricultureetd'horticulture des Fougères, 1964 Conthey, 90 p.
  19. Granges A., Gillioz J.M., Quentin H. & Ahmed O. (2006). Old tomato varieties: agronomic, analytical and taste values. Revue Suisse de Viticulture, Arboriculture et Horticulture 38(2): 97-103.
  20. Agassounon D.T.M., Gomez S., Tchobo F.P., Soumanou M.M. & Toukourou F. (2012). Trial of tomato preservation by the technique of dehydration impregnation by immersion (DII). International Journal of Biological and Chemical Sciences, 6: 657-669.
  21. Pinela J., Barros L., Carvalho A.M. & Ferreira I.C.F.R. (2012). Nutritional composition and antioxidant activity of four tomato (Lycopersicon Esculentum L.) farmer' varieties in North Eastern Portugal home gardens. Food Chemistry and Toxicology, 50(3-4): 829-834.
  22. Sulbarán B., Sierra E., Ojeda de Rodriguez G., Berradre M., Fernandez V. & Pena J. (2011). Evaluacion de la actividadantioxidantedeltomatecrudo y procesado. Revista de la Facultad de Agronomia, 28: 273-291.
  23. FAO (2012). West African Food Composition Table (Italy, Rome), 148 p.
  24. Fagbohoun O. & Kiki D. (1999), Overview of the main local tomato varieties grown in southern Benin. Bulletin de la rechercheagronomique du Bénin, 24, 10-21 INRAB, Cotonou, République du Bénin.
  25. Dossou J., Soule I. &Montcho M. (2007). Evaluation of the physico-chemical and sensory characteristics of local tomato puree produced on a small scale in Benin. Tropicultura, 25: 119-125.
  26. Sherman, Leonard G. L. , Marsh D, Tombropoules J. E., Buhlert And Heil J. (1977). Evaluation of tomato condition in bin of processing tornatoes harvested at different levels of ripeness .Journal of Food Processing and Preservation. pp. 55-68.
  27. Bavay C. (2013). Adaptation of sensory evaluation methodologies to agro-food products with high variability. PhD thesis from the University of Angers in Food Science, France, 145 p.