Corrective Maintenance for Energy Efficiency: A Case Study in a Mineral Water Bottle Production Area

Abstract

Energy efficiency is an effort made with the aim of reducing the amount of energy needed when using equipment or even an energy-related system. Energy efficiency can be achieved by adopting more efficient technologies or production processes. A good maintenance strategy will maximize production efficiency and play an important role in the sustainability of production operations. This study aims to analyze the relationship between energy efficiency and corrective maintenance carried out in the production areas of mineral water companies. The implementation of corrective maintenance is applied to the gallon/bottle washer machine, which is the main equipment in the bottled mineral water production process. Implementation of corrective maintenance is carried out using the Plan, Do, Check, Act (PDCA) cycle for continuous improvement. The results showed that energy consumption decreased after several corrective maintenance tasks were carried out on the washer machine. The energy efficiency obtained is 42.13 kWh/1000 bottles of production, or equivalent to a decrease of 7.2%.

Country : Indonesia

1 Norman Iskandar2 Sulardjaka3 Cucu Bachtiar Achmad

  1. Mechanical Engineering, Diponegoro University, Semarang, Indonesia
  2. Mechanical Engineering, Diponegoro University, Semarang, Indonesia
  3. Mechanical Engineering, Diponegoro University, Semarang, Indonesia

IRJIET, Volume 7, Issue 5, May 2023 pp. 183-190

doi.org/10.47001/IRJIET/2023.705021

References

  1. Moynihan, Gary & Barringer, Frank. (2017). Energy Efficiency in Manufacturing Facilities: Assessment, Analysis and Implementation. 10.5772/64902.
  2. Gahm, Christian & Denz, Florian & Dirr, Martin & Tuma, Axel. (2015). Energy-efficient scheduling in manufacturing companies: A review and research framework. European Journal of Operational Research. 248. 10.1016/j.ejor.2015.07.017.
  3. Kamal, Athar & Al-Ghamdi, Sami G. & Koç, Muammer. (2019). Revaluing the costs and benefits of energy efficiency: A systematic review. Energy Research & Social Science. 54. 68-84. 10.1016/j.erss.2019.03.012.
  4. Alturki, Eng. (2017). Four-Stroke and Two-Stroke Marine Engines Comparison and Application. International Journal of Engineering Research and Applications. 07. 49-56. 10.9790/9622-0704034956.
  5. Yu, Tian & Zhu, Cheng & Chang, Qing & Wang, Junfeng. (2019). Imperfect corrective maintenance scheduling for energy efficient manufacturing systems through online task allocation method. Journal of Manufacturing Systems. 53. 282-290. 10.1016/j.jmsy.2019.11.002.
  6. Lewis, Angela & Elmualim, Abbas & Riley, David. (2011). Linking energy and maintenance management for sustainability through three American case studies. Facilities. 29. 243-254. 10.1108/02632771111120547.
  7. Watkins, Ryan & Meiers, Maurya & Visser, Yusra. (2011). A Guide To Assessing Needs: Essential Tools for Collecting Information, Making Decisions, and Achieving Development Results (published open access by the World Bank).
  8. H. Pačaiová and G. Ižaríková, “Base principles and practices for implementation of total productive maintenance in automotive industry,” Qual. Innov. Prosper., vol. 23, no. 1, pp. 45–59, 2019, doi: 10.12776/QIP.V23I1.1203.
  9. S. A. Albliwi, J. Antony, N. Arshad, and A. Chadge, “Studies on Six Sigma Implementation Model To Improve Customer Satisfaction in Sand Casting Foundries,” Electron. Libr., vol. 34, no. 4, pp. 1–21, 2017.
  10. C. Jaqin, A. Rozak, and H. H. Purba, “Case Study in Increasing Overall Equipment Effectiveness on Progressive Press Machine Using Plan-do-check-act Cycle,” Int. J. Eng. Trans. B Appl., vol. 33, no. 11, pp. 2245–2251, 2020, doi: 10.5829/ije.2020.33.11b.16.
  11. L. S. Valamede and A. C. S. Akkari, “Lean 4.0: A new holistic approach for the integration of lean manufacturing tools and digital technologies,” Int. J. Math. Eng. Manag. Sci., vol. 5, no. 5, pp. 854–868, 2020, doi: 10.33889/IJMEMS.2020.5.5.066.
  12. S. Modgil and S. Sharma, “Total productive maintenance, total quality management and operational performance An empirical study of Indian pharmaceutical industry,” J. Qual. Maint. Eng., vol. 22, no. 4, pp. 353–377, 2016, doi: 10.1108/JQME-10-2015-0048.
  13. B. S. and T. T. Vi Nguyen , Nam Nguyen, “applied sciences Practical Application of Plan – Do – Check – Act Cycle for Quality Improvement of Sustainable Packaging :,” 2020.
  14. S. Sahoo, “An empirical exploration of TQM, TPM and their integration from Indian manufacturing industry,” J. Manuf. Technol. Manag., vol. 29, no. 7, pp. 1188–1210, 2018, doi: 10.1108/JMTM-03-2018-0075.
  15. A.Alkhoraif, H. Rashid, and P. McLaughlin, “Lean implementation in small and medium enterprises: Literature review,” Oper. Res. Perspect., vol. 6, no. July 2018, p. 100089, 2019, doi: 10.1016/j.orp.2018.100089.
  16. M. S. Carrillo Landazábal, C. G. Alvis Ruiz, Y. Y. Mendoza Álvarez, and H. E. Cohen Padilla, “Lean manufacturing: 5 s y TPM, herramientas de mejora de la calidad. Caso empresa metalmecánica en Cartagena, Colombia,” Signos, vol. 11, pp. 71–86, 2019, doi: 10.15332/s2145-1389.2019.0001.04.
  17. Wibowo, Kristanto & Sugiyarto, Sugiyarto & Setiono, Setiono. (2018). Analisa dan Evaluasi : Akar Penyebab dan Biaya Sisa Material Konstruksi Proyek Pembangunan Kantor Kelurahan di Kota Solo, Sekolah, dan Pasar Menggunakan Root Cause Analysis (RCA) dan Fault Tree Analysis (FTA). Matriks Teknik Sipil. 6. 10.20961/mateksi.v6i2.36572.