Multistoried and Multi Bay RCC Building Frame by Using Seismic Design

Abstract

The seismic design of the frame building proposed in this project is based on IS 1893-2002 and IS 800. The aim of the present project is to determine the multi-storey and multi-bay (G+3) building frame according to seismic forces. It was designed according to IS 1893 and later IS 800: 2007. The frame is four-fold, with two partitions in the horizontal direction and three partitions in the vertical direction. The selection of a segment depends on a number of criteria. The two methods used for analysis are the equivalent static charge method and the response spectrum method.

The results obtained from the two methods were compared in terms of storey displacement, storey displacement and foundation shear. Frames were also analyzed with P-Δ analysis and time to correct for IBC code. Then, based on this analysis process, a time-resistant steel frame was designed according to IS-800:2007. Check the design again and compare the results by material.

The cost-effectiveness of the two methods was compared. Finally, the connection between the inside and outside of the frame is created and calculated. In addition, the construction of the base plate foundation conforms to IS 800:2007. The software used for analysis and design is STAAD PRO. Adequate bibliography and comparisons have been made during both design and review.

Country : India

1 Kanchanmani Poudel

  1. Department of Civil Engineering, Roorkee Institute of Technology, Roorkee, India

IRJIET, Volume 8, Issue 1, January 2024 pp. 209-216

doi.org/10.47001/IRJIET/2024.801026

References

  1. K, K. H., & Professor, A. (2020). Analysis & Design of Multi-Storey Building Using Staad Pro and E-Tabs. International Research Journal of Engineering and Technology. www.irjet.net.
  2. Wadekar, A., & G. Dahake, A. (2020). Analysis and Design of a Multi-Storey Building by Using Staad Pro: a Review. International Journal of Advanced Research, 08(04), 67–76. https://doi.org/10.21474/ijar01/10746.
  3. IS 1893 (Part 1). (2016). IS 1893 (Criteria for Earthquake resistant design of structures, Part 1: General Provisions and buildings). Bureau of Indian Standards, New Delhi, 1893(December), 1–44.
  4. Sasidhar, T., Manadeep, T. B., Siva Kishore, I., & Surjana, N. (2017). Analysing and designing of a high-rise building (G+10) by STAAD.Pro. International Journal of Civil Engineering and Technology, 8(4), 654–658.
  5. Jayakrishna, T., Murali, K., Satish, P., & Seetunya, J. (2018). Seismic analysis of regular and irregular multi-storey buildings by using staad.pro. International Journal of Civil Engineering and Technology, 9(1), 431–439.
  6. Qureshi, M. A., Shah, D., Solanki, B., Baldaniya, D., Patel, D., & Shah, K. (2018). Earthquake Behavior of Building Using Staad Pro. 486–491.
  7. Kalra, M., Kumar, G., & Choudhary, L. (2018). Seismic response of RCC framed structure with floating columns. International Journal of Sustainable Building Technology and Urban Development, 9(1), 18-30, https://doi.org/10.22712/susb.201800038.8.
  8. Georgoussis, G., Tsompanos, A., & Makarios, T. (2015). Approximate seismic analysis of multi-story buildings with mass and stiffness irregularities. Procedia Engineering, 125, 959–966. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.proeng.2155.11.147.
  9. Gomasa Ramesh, Dharna Ramya, Mandala Sheshu Kumar; “Health Monitoring of Structures by Using Non-Destructive Testing Methods”, International Journal of Advances in Engineering and Management (IJAEM) Volume 2, Issue 2, pp: 652-654, DOI: 10.35629/5252-45122323, ISSN:2395-5252, ISO 9001: 2008 Certified Journal.
  10. Gomasa Ramesh, Doddipati Srinath, Mandala Sheshu Kumar; "Earthquake Resistant of RCC Structures" Published in International Journal of Trend in Scientific Research and Development (ijtsrd), ISSN: 2456-6470, Volume-4, Issue-5, August 2020, pp.808-811.
  11. Griffith M. C., Pinto A. V. (2000), “Seismic Retrofit of RC Buildings - A Review and Case Study”, University of Adelaide, Adelaide, Australia and European Commission, Joint Research Centre, Ispra Italy.
  12. Sanghani bharat k. and Paresh Girishbhai Patel, 2011, “Behaviour of Building Component in Various Zones,” International Journal of Advances in Engineering Sciences, Vol. 1, Issue 1(Jan. 2011).
  13. Poonam, Kumar Anil and Gupta Ashok K, 2012, “Study of Response of Structural Irregular Building Frames to Seismic Excitations,” International Journal of Civil, Structural, Environmental and Infrastructure Engineering Research and Development (IJCSEIERD), ISSN 2249-6866 Vol.2, Issue 2 (2012) 25-31.
  14. Ashik S. Parasiya and Paresh Nimodiya (2013), “A review on comparative analysis of brace frame with conventional lateral load resisting RC frame using software.
  15. Mr. Kiran Kumar and Mr. papa Rao G (2013), “Comparison of percentage of steel and concrete quantities of a RC building in different seismic zones.
  16. Chandurkar P.P (2013), “Seismic analysis of RCC Building with and without Shear wall-A literature review on experimental study.