Analysis of the Effectiveness of Bagging Machines in Increasing Chicken Feed Production Capacity in the Bagging Off Process

Abstract

The bagging machine is an essential component in the chicken feed production process. This machine functions to package livestock feed into bags with weights that meet specified standards. The machine can automatically weigh, fill, and seal feed bags with high speed and accuracy. This research aims to evaluate the performance of bagging machines in chicken feed production, focusing on increasing production capacity, reducing operational costs, and improving the quality of the final product. The study results indicate that using an automatic bagging machine significantly increases production capacity by up to 25% compared to previous manual methods, and operational costs decrease by 15% due to reduced downtime and improved labor efficiency. To determine the overall effectiveness of the machine, a calculation method is required to obtain values of availability, performance efficiency, and rate of quality, leading to solutions for optimizing the machine's effectiveness through proposing a more efficient layout. The results obtained after making changes are expected to increase production capacity to the optimal limit that the machine can produce.

Country : Indonesia

1 M. Munadi2 Hermawan Putranto

  1. Mechanical Engineering Department, Faculty of Engineering, Diponegoro University, Jl. Prof. H. Soedarto, SH, Tembalang-Semarang 50275, Indonesia
  2. Mechanical Engineering Department, Faculty of Engineering, Diponegoro University, Jl. Prof. H. Soedarto, SH, Tembalang-Semarang 50275, Indonesia

IRJIET, Volume 8, Issue 5, May 2024 pp. 308-313

doi.org/10.47001/IRJIET/2024.805040

References

  1. Aminata, R. N., Muhaimin, A. W., & Primaningtyas, D. N. (2015). Performance Analysis of Animal Feed Main Raw Material Suppliers (Specifically in the Animal Feed Agro industry Company PT. Japfa Comfeed Indonesia Gedangan Unit, Sidoarjo, East Java). Habitat, XXVI.
  2. Jaelani, A. (2021). Production Process and Physical Quality Testing in the Feed Industry. Banjar Baru: Zukzez Express.
  3. Hariyono, Miko. (2009). Evaluation of Machine Effectiveness with the Implementation of Total Productive Maintenance (TPM) at PT Hadi Baru. Final Undergraduated Project. The University of North Sumatra (USU).
  4. Uyun, Q. (2006). Proposed Use of the OEE Calculation Method in the Maintenance Department at PT. KHI Pipe Industry. Final Undergraduated Project. Industrial Engineering of Sultan Ageng Tirtayasa University.
  5. Gazpers, V. (2002). Analysis Methods for Quality Improvement. Gramedia Pustaka Utama. Jakarta.
  6. Bühler Group. 2016. "Innovations for a Better World: Bühler's Innovations Magazine."
  7. Hansen, R.C. (2001). Overall Equipment Effectiveness. First Edition. New York: Industrial Press Inc.
  8. Wulandari, T. (2011). System Failure Analysis using Fault Tree. Final Undergraduated Project. Indonesia University.
  9. Nakajima, S. 1988. Introduction to Total Productive Maintanance (TPM). Cambridge: Productivity Press.
  10. Wignjosoebroto, S. (2008). Ergonomi, Motion and Time Studies: Analysis Techniques for Increasing Work Productivity. First Edition. Guna Widya, Surabaya.
  11. Vesely, W.E, (1981). “Bottleneck Handbook”. Washington D.C.: U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commision.
  12. Kumar, S. (2006). Production and Operation Management. New Age International Publisher, New Delhi.
  13. Rander, Berry and Jay Haizer.(2007). Principles of Operations Management. Salemba Empat, Bandung.
  14. Banks J, N. B. (2010) Discrete-event System Simulation (4th ed). NJ: Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River.
  15. McCarthy, D and Rich, N. (2004). Lean TPM a Blueprint for Change. Burlington: Elsevier.