International Research Journal of Innovations in Engineering and Technology - IRJIET International Open Access, Monthly, Peer Reviewed, Reputed Journal ISSN (online): 2581-3048

Impact Factor (2025): 6.9

DOI Prefix: 10.47001/IRJIET

Study of Making Concrete Block Using Gawan River Sand and Coal Waste (Bottom Ash) with Portland Cement Padang Viewed from the Perspective of Strength and Production Costs

Abstract

Data from the DPUPR of Sragen district, the price of Merapi sand in 2020 is IDR 1,590,000 then in 2021 the price of Merapi sand is IDR 1,680,000. The increase in the material price of Merapi sand in Sragen Regency has forced the brick maker UD. Cerah, whose address is in Dayu village, Jurang Jero sub-district, Karangmalang sub-district, Sragen district, is again racking her brains to set a selling price for the bricks to avoid losses. The making of the brick itself cannot be separated from the costs incurred for purchasing raw materials, purchasing equipment for making bricks, and labor costs. So with the high price of Merapi sand material, it requires that the brick maker, UD. Sunny innovates by replacing the cheaper sand material. In this study using experimental methods for making bricks, using the full costing method for calculating production costs and using the depreciation method to obtain the annual depreciation load for brick machines. Based on research on the characteristics of fine aggregate river sand from Ngipang village, Gawan sub-district, Tanon sub-district, Sragen district, the results of testing for silt content, testing for organic matter content, testing for specific gravity and water absorption, gradation testing met the requirements while testing for saturated surface dry (SSD) did not meet the requirements. Then research on the characteristics of fine aggregate from coal waste (bottom ash) obtained the results of testing for mud content, testing for organic matter content, testing for gradation that met the requirements while testing for specific gravity and water absorption, testing for saturated surface dry (SSD) did not meet the requirements. Based on the research on the compressive strength test of the bricks, it was found that the compressive strength of the bricks from river sand, Ngipang village, Gawan sub-district, Tanon sub-district, Sragen district was greater than the compressive strength of the bricks from coal waste (bottom ash), the maximum average compressive strength value of bricks from river sand in the village Ngiang, Gawan sub-district, Tanon sub-district, Sragen district obtained a value of 6.51 MPa on the 1PC : 5PS FAS mixture variation of 0.5, while the maximum compressive strength value of bricks made from coal waste (bottom ash) obtained a value of 5.10 MPa on the variation mix 1PC : 5BA FAS 0.6. Based on research on the production costs of making bricks, it was found that the production costs of making 1 m3 of river sand bricks in Ngipang village, Gawan sub-district, Tanon sub-district, Sragen district were greater than the production costs of making 1 m3 of coal waste (bottom ash) bricks, the production costs of 1 m3 river sand bricks in Ngipang village, village Gawan, Tanon sub-district, Sragen district, the highest is in the mix variation of 1PC: 5PS FAS 0.6 with the production cost of IDR 962,237.49, while the largest 1 m3 coal waste (bottom ash) brick production cost is in the 1PC mix variation: 5BA FAS 0.6 with a production cost of IDR 659,285.51.

Country : Indonesia

1 Co. Prof. Muhammad Nur Sahid2 Bayu Aji Santoso

  1. Civil Engineering, Universitas Muhammadiyah Surakarta, Indonesia
  2. Civil Engineering, Universitas Muhammadiyah Surakarta, Indonesia

IRJIET, Volume 8, Issue 7, July 2024 pp. 35-42

doi.org/10.47001/IRJIET/2024.807003

Full Paper
Download

References

  1. Alhokabi, Abdulmajeed Ali, and Shu Ing Doh. 2019. “Study on The Mechanical Properties of Bottom Ash as a Partial Sand Replacement in a Non-Load Bearing Fly Ash Bricks.” Saudi Journal of Civil Engineering (Saudi J Civ Eng) 3(3):59–66.
  2. Basuki Widodo, Wahyu Panji Asmoro, and Eko Yohanes Setyawan. 2021. “Aplikasi Mesin Mixer Batako Untuk Pengadukan Adonan Semen, Pasir, Koral Dan Pasir Untuk Menigkatkan Kualitas Batako.” JASTEN (Jurnal Aplikasi Sains Teknologi Nasional) 2(2):38–43.
  3. Dewi, Diyah Persilliana, and Sari Hayati. 2020. “Calculation Analysis of Production Costs Using Variable.” 01(02):21–24.
  4. Haryono, Yon, Beny Lianto, and Hudiyo Firmanto. 2021. “Rancangbangun Mesin Pencetak Batako Sistem Gravitational Drop And Vibration Menggunakan Matras 4 Cavity Untuk IKM Desa Bungur Kecamatan Tulakan Kabupaten Pacitan.” 3(1):4–8.
  5. Mohammed, Syakirah Afiza, Suhana Koting, Herda Yati Binti Katman, Ali Mohammed Babalghaith, Muhamad Fazly Abdul Patah, Mohd Rasdan Ibrahim, and Mohamed Rehan Karim. 2021. “A Review of the Utilization of Coal Bottom Ash (Cba) in the Construction Industry.” Sustainability (Switzerland) 13(14):1–16.
  6. Mulyadi. n.d. Akuntansi-Biaya-.-Intro (1).Pdf.
  7. Nafisah, Nailatun, A. Manaf Dientri, Novi Darmayanti, Wahyu Winarno, and Hairudin Hairudin. 2021. “Analisis Perhitungan Harga Pokok Produksi Dengan Metode Full Costing Dan Variable Costing Sebagai Dasar Penetapan Harga Jual Produk.” J-MACC : Journal of Management and Accounting 4(1):1–15.
  8. Putri, Desi, Rr. Mekar Ageng Kinasti, and Divad Fredonanta Lalus. 2019. “Pemanfaatan Limbah Bottom Ash Dan Limbah Kaca Pada Campuran Batako.” Construction and Material Journal 1(3):211–18.
  9. Putri, Fetty Ade, and Efani Desi. 2020. “Cost of Production Price Analysis Using Job Order Costing Method In CV. Alam Lestari Jaya.” International Journal of Information System & Technology Akreditasi 4(36):349–53.
  10. Rukminingsih, Gunawan Adnan, and Mohammad Adnan Latief. 2020. Metode Penelitian Pendidikan. Penelitian Kuantitatif, Penelitian Kualitatif, Penelitian Tindakan Kelas. Vol. 53.
  11. Sayed Jamaludin, S. I., N. H. Abdul Rani, and N. F. Mohamad. 2019. “Investigation of Water Absorption and Strength Performances on Concrete Bricks Containing Malaysian Thermal Power Plant Coal Bottom Ash (CBA).” Journal of Physics: Conference Series 1349(1).
  12. Studi, Program, Teknik Pertambangan, Jurusan Teknik, Pertambangan Dan, Fakultas Teknik, and Universitas Sriwijaya. 2021. “Luthfia Okta Fericha 03021281722054.”
  13. Sulistiani, Heni, Esy Ervina Yanti, and Rakhmat Dedi Gunawan. 2021. “Penerapan Metode Full Costing Pada Sistem Informasi Akuntansi Biaya Produksi (Studi Kasus: Konveksi Serasi Bandar Lampung).” Jurnal Ilmiah Sistem Informasi Akuntansi 1(1):35–47.
  14. Mufti Amir Sultan, Imran Imran, and Rofika Sakti. 2019. “Subtitusi Parsial Agregat Halus Dengan Bottom Ash Pada Pembuatan Bata Semen.” Rekayasa Sipil 13(1):64–69.
  15. Suprianto, Suprianto, Bina Andari, and Yely Sulistyawati. 2019. “Calculation of Production Cost in Ud. Usaha Baru With Full Costing Method.” JARES (Journal of Academic Research and Sciences) 4(1):28–42.
  16. Wiyono, Sugeng, Zulhendri Zulhendri, Mohd. Alfajrizal, and Anas Puri. 2018. “Kajian Perbandingan Penggunaan Berbagai Merek Semen Dengan Dan Tanpa Perawatan Terhadap Kuat Tekan Dan Kuat Lentur Beton Pada Perkerasan Kaku.” Jurnal Saintis 18(2):33–42.

Copyright @ 2026-2017 IRJIET. All Right Reserved.

Developed by Byzero Technologies