International Research Journal of Innovations in Engineering and Technology - IRJIET International Open Access, Monthly, Peer Reviewed, Reputed Journal ISSN (online): 2581-3048

Impact Factor (2025): 6.9

DOI Prefix: 10.47001/IRJIET

Advances in Adaptive Filtering for Coherent Dual-Polarization Optical Communication Systems and Their Integration in Dynamic Optical Networks

Abstract

A thorough examination of current developments in adaptive filtering for coherent dual-polarization optical communication systems is provided in this work. The emphasis is on high-capacity networks made possible by dual-polarization, coherent detection, variable bit-rate transceivers. The review explores the effectiveness of different adaptive algorithms in coherent receivers, the importance of dual polarization, and the function of adaptive filters in reducing channel impairments. The research also sheds light on the trade-offs and difficulties related to flexible bitrate optical transceivers. The paper comprises an extensive assessment of dynamic optical networks, categorized by network granularity and generation, in addition to the study of adaptive filtering. A comprehensive understanding of the developments in dynamic optical networking technologies is provided by the discussion of the evolution and traits of each generation. The poll also covers optical access networks, emphasizing the acceptance and advantages of optical access protocols as IEEE EPON and ITU-T GPON. The study also examines how digital filtering might be used to manage transmission constraints, highlighting the significance of segmenting digital filtering into distinct blocks. An overview of the types and applications of optical filters utilized in optical communication systems is included in the discussion. The study wraps up with a review of the literature that summarizes current research on optical communication systems, such as studies on adaptive algorithms' convergence properties, coherent dual-polarization receivers, and machine learning's use in optical fiber communication. The contributions of this paper include a thorough analysis of adaptive algorithm performance, a comparative study of dynamic optical networks, and a comprehensive overview of recent research in optical communication systems.

Country : Iraq

1 Huda A. Abdulhadi2 Dia M. Ali3 Ehab Al-Rawachy

  1. Communication Engineering Department, College of Electronics Engineering, University of Nineveh, Mosul-Iraq
  2. Communication Engineering Department, College of Electronics Engineering, University of Nineveh, Mosul-Iraq
  3. Communication Engineering Department, College of Electronics Engineering, University of Nineveh, Mosul-Iraq

IRJIET, Volume 8, Issue 8, August 2024 pp. 118-127

doi.org/10.47001/IRJIET/2024.808014

Full Paper
Download

References

  1. W. Shieh and I. Djordjevic, OFDM for Optical Communications. 2009. doi: 10.1016/C2009-0-19354-6.
  2. A.V. Lukanenkov, “Experimental Confirmation of the Doubts about Authenticity of Event GW150914,” J. Appl. Math. Phys., vol. 05, no. 02, pp. 538–550, 2017, doi: 10.4236/jamp.2017.52046.
  3. A.A.N. Kolmogorov, W. L. Doyle, and I. Selin, “Interpolation and extrapolation of stationary random sequences.,” 1962. [Online]. Available: https://api.semanticscholar.org/CorpusID:117181677
  4. A. Abdo and C. D’Amours, “Adaptive Filtering in Optical Coherent Flexible Bit-Rate Receivers in the Presence of State-of-Polarization Transients and Colored Noise,” J. Comput. Networks Commun., vol. 2019, 2019, doi: 10.1155/2019/2938653.
  5. H. Kogelnik, R. Jopson, and L. Nelson, “Polarization-Mode Dispersion,” in Optical Fiber Telecommunications IVB, 2002, pp. 725–861. doi: 10.1016/B978-012395173-1/50015-3.
  6. H. Alazki and A. Poznyak, “Robust Model-Free Software Sensors for the HIV/AIDS Infection Process,” Int. J. Mod. Nonlinear Theory Appl., vol. 06, no. 02, pp. 39–58, 2017, doi: 10.4236/ijmnta.2017.62004.
  7. S. Bennett, “The emergence of a discipline: Automatic control 1940–1960,” Automatica, vol. 12, no. 2, pp. 113–121, 1976, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/0005-1098(76)90075-3.
  8. N. Sireesha, K. Chithra, and T. Sudhakar, “Performance analysis of linear recursive least squares adaptive filter to mitigate multipath effect,” Int. Symp. Ocean Electron. SYMPOL, vol. 2016-Octob, no. January, 2016, doi: 10.1109/SYMPOL.2015.7581161.
  9. J. M. D. MENDINUETA, “Digital signal processing optical receivers for the mitigation of physical layer impairments in dynamic optical networks,” Thesis, no. September, p. 163, 2011.
  10. A.A. Salih, M. A. M. Sadeeq, S. R. M. Zeebaree, A. S. Abdulraheem, R. R. Zebari, and O. M. Ahmed, “Evolution of Mobile Wireless Communication to 5G Revolution Artificial Intelligence View project Data Communications and Networking View project Evolution of Mobile Wireless Communication to 5G Revolution,” vol. 62, no. June, 2020, [Online]. Available: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/342549960
  11. A.A. Salih, M. A. M. Sadeeq, S. R. M. Zeebaree, A. S. Abdulraheem, R. R. Zebari, and O. M. Ahmed, “Evolution of Mobile Wireless Communication to 5G Revolution Artificial Intelligence View project Data Communications and Networking View project Evolution of Mobile Wireless Communication to 5G Revolution,” vol. 62, no. June, 2020.
  12. B. Bhushan, S. Kumar, S. Raghvendra, K. Ishaani, and P. E. 5g, Springer Tracts in Electrical and Electronics Engineering. [Online]. Available: https://www.springer.com/us/authors-editors/journal-author/journal-author-hel
  13. H. Hodara and E. Skaljo, “From 1G to 5G,” Fiber Integr. Opt., vol. 40, no. 2–3, pp. 85–183, 2021, doi: 10.1080/01468030.2021.1919358.
  14. N. I. Zaidi, M. Hafiz, and M. Yusof, “XXX-X-XXXX-XXXX-X/XX/$XX.00 ©20XX IEEE Data Communication and Networking: Challenges and Solutions”.
  15. X. Jing, J. Zhao, Z. Yan, W. Pedrycz, and X. Li, “Granular classifier: Building traffic granules for encrypted traffic classification based on granular computing,” Digit. Commun. Networks, 2022, doi: 10.1016/j.dcan.2022.12.017.
  16. N. Afraz, F. Slyne, H. Gill, and M. Ruffini, “Evolution of access network sharing and its role in 5G networks,” Appl. Sci., vol. 9, no. 21, 2019, doi: 10.3390/app9214566.
  17. K. R. Vemu, S. Bhatnagar, and N. Hemachandra, “Link route pricing for enhanced QoS,” Proc. IEEE Conf. Decis. Control, vol. 2, no. 2, pp. 1504–1509, 2007, doi: 10.1109/CDC.2007.4434595.
  18. A.Pellacani, M. Graziano, and M. Suatoni, “Design , Development , Validation and Verification of GNC technologies,” Eucass2019, no. July, p. 28760, 2019, doi: 10.13009/EUCASS2019-38.
  19. P. Henry, “Lightwave primer,” IEEE J. Quantum Electron., vol. 21, no. 12, pp. 1862–1879, 1985, doi: 10.1109/JQE.1985.1072601.
  20. S. J. Savory, “Digital filters for coherent optical receivers,” Opt. Express, vol. 16, no. 2, p. 804, 2008, doi: 10.1364/oe.16.000804.
  21. G. Jacobsen, T. Xu, S. Popov, J. Li, A. T. Friberg, and Y. Zhang, “Receiver implemented RF pilot tone phase noise mitigation in coherent optical nPSK and nQAM systems,” Opt. Express, vol. 19, no. 15, p. 14487, 2011, doi: 10.1364/oe.19.014487.
  22. J. A. Alvarez-Chavez, R. Sanchez-Lara, J. R. Ek-Ek, H. L. Offerhaus, M. May-Alarcon, and V. Golikov, “Optimum Power in a Multi-Span DWDM System Limited by Non-Linear Effects,” Opt. Photonics J., vol. 08, no. 12, pp. 337–347, 2018, doi: 10.4236/opj.2018.812029.
  23. G. Li and J. Li, “A Pulse Shaping Based Optical Transmission System of 128QAM for DWDM with N × 904 Gbps,” Applied Sciences, vol. 9, no. 5. 2019. doi: 10.3390/app9050988.
  24. M. Mabrouk, “BRAGG GRATING AND FABRY-PEROT FILTERS IN DATA TRANSMISSION BY BRAGG GRATING AND FABRY-PEROT FILTERS,” no. July 2009, 2019.
  25. V. L. Kalyani and V. Sharma, “Different types of Optical Filters and their Realistic Application,” J. Manag. Eng. Inf. Technol., no. July, 2016.
  26. T. Tanimura and T. Hoshida, “Chapter Six - Deep learning techniques for optical monitoring,” A. P. T. Lau and F. N. B. T.-M. L. for F. F.-O. C. S. Khan, Eds., Academic Press, 2022, pp. 141–188. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-32-385227-2.00013-9.
  27. F. Solis, B. T. Reyes, D. A. Morero, and M. R. Hueda, “Error-Backpropagation-Based Background Calibration of TI-ADC for Adaptively Equalized Digital Communication Receivers,” IEEE Access, vol. 10, no. October, pp. 103013–103027, 2022, doi: 10.1109/ACCESS.2022.3208092.
  28. M. H. Hayes, “Schaum’s Outline for Digital Signal Processing,” Digit. Signal Process., vol. 1, p. 435, 1999, [Online]. Available: https://courses.e-ce.uth.gr/CE446/schaum.pdf
  29. P. J. Gawthrop and L. Wang, Infinite-impulse and finite-impulse response filters for continuous-time parameter estimation, vol. 15, no. 1. IFAC, 2002. doi: 10.3182/20020721-6-es-1901.01006.
  30. X. N. Fernando and A. B. Sesay, “Higher order Adaptive filter Characterization of Microwave Fiber Optic link Nonlinearity,” Opt. Pulse Beam Propag. II, vol. 3927, no. October, pp. 39–49, 2000, doi: 10.1117/12.382081.
  31. T. Weyrauch, M. A. Vorontsov, J. Gowens, and T. G. Bifano, “Fiber coupling with adaptive optics for free-space optical communication,” Free. Laser Commun. Laser Imaging, vol. 4489, no. May, pp. 177–184, 2002, doi: 10.1117/12.453227.
  32. R. B. T.-H. of G. E. S. E. Unger, “Chapter 4 - Seismic Active Monitoring System Concept,” in Active Geophysical Monitoring, vol. 40, Pergamon, 2010, pp. 73–90. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0950-1401(10)04009-7.
  33. W. Shieh and I. Djordjevic, “Chapter 3 - Optical Communication Fundamentals,” W. Shieh and I. B. T.-O. for O. C. Djordjevic, Eds., Oxford: Academic Press, 2010, pp. 53–118. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-374879-9.00003-4.
  34. W. Yafeng, Y. Hao, Y. Dacheng, and W. Xiang, “Iterative decision feedback equalizer with cyclic detection for DFT-S OFDM system,” Comput. Electr. Eng., vol. 36, no. 4, pp. 789–801, 2010, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compeleceng.2008.11.002.
  35. P. Johannisson, M. Sjödin, M. Karlsson, H. Wymeersch, E. Agrell, and P. A. Andrekson, “Modified constant modulus algorithm for polarization-switched QPSK,” Opt. Express, vol. 19, no. 8, p. 7734, 2011, doi: 10.1364/oe.19.007734.
  36. S. Zhang and T. R. Gadekallu, “Digital interference signal filtering on laser interface for optical fiber communication,” EAI Endorsed Trans. Scalable Inf. Syst., vol. 10, no. 2, pp. 1–11, 2023, doi: 10.4108/eetsis.v10i1.2589.
  37. L. M. Torres, F. J. Cañete, and L. Díez, “Matched Filtering for MIMO Coherent Optical Communications with Mode-Dependent Loss Channels,” Sensors (Basel)., vol. 22, no. 3, 2022, doi: 10.3390/s22030798.
  38. V. L. Kalyani and V. Sharma, “Different types of Optical Filters and their Realistic Application,” J. Manag. Eng. Inf. Technol., vol. 3, no. 3, pp. 2394–8124, 2016.
  39. T. Pfau et al., “32-Krad/s polarization and 3-dB PDL tracking in a realtime digital coherent polarization-multiplexed QPSK receiver,” LEOS Summer Top. Meet., pp. 105–106, 2008, doi: 10.1109/LEOSST.2008.4590511.
  40. A.Noori, A. Amphawan, A. Ghazi, and S. A. Aljunid Ghazi, “Dynamic evolving neural fuzzy inference system equalization scheme in mode division multiplexer for optical fiber transmission,” Bull. Electr. Eng. Informatics, vol. 8, no. 1, pp. 127–135, 2019, doi: 10.11591/eei.v8i1.1399.
  41. W. Yi et al., “Performance of momentum-based frequency-domain MIMO equalizer in the presence of feedback delay,” Opt. Express, vol. 28, no. 13, p. 19133, 2020, doi: 10.1364/oe.394304.
  42. P. K. Meher and S. Y. Park, “Low adaptation-delay LMS adaptive filter part-I: Introducing a novel multiplication cell,” Midwest Symp. Circuits Syst., no. August 2011, 2011, doi: 10.1109/MWSCAS.2011.6026642.
  43. Y. Feng et al., “Joint tracking and equalization scheme for multi-polarization effects in coherent optical communication systems,” Opt. Express, vol. 24, no. 22, p. 25491, 2016, doi: 10.1364/oe.24.025491.
  44. D. Chu, “Polyphase codes with good periodic correlation properties (Corresp.),” IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory, vol. 18, no. 4, pp. 531–532, 1972, doi: 10.1109/TIT.1972.1054840.
  45. M. Nölle, F. Frey, R. Elschner, C. Schmidt-Langhorst, J. K. Fischer, and C. Schubert, “Investigation of CAZAC Sequences for Data-Aided Channel Estimation Considering Nonlinear Optical Transmission,” in Optical Fiber Communication Conference, Optica Publishing Group, 2015, p. Th3G.2. doi: 10.1364/OFC.2015.Th3G.2.
  46. X. Pan, X. Wang, B. Tian, C. Wang, H. Zhang, and M. Guizani, “Machine-Learning-Aided Optical Fiber Communication System,” IEEE Netw., vol. 35, pp. 136–142, Jul. 2021, doi: 10.1109/MNET.011.2000676.
  47. T. Verolet et al., “Mode Locked Laser Phase Noise Reduction Under Optical Feedback for Coherent DWDM Communication,” J. Light. Technol., vol. 38, no. 20, pp. 5708–5715, 2020, doi: 10.1109/JLT.2020.3002653.
  48. C. Zhu, A. V. Tran, C. C. Do, S. Chen, T. Anderson, and E. Skafidas, “Digital signal processing for training-aided coherent optical single-carrier frequency-domain equalization systems,” J. Light. Technol., vol. 32, no. 24, pp. 4712–4722, 2014, doi: 10.1109/JLT.2014.2364078.
  49. F. Pittalà, I. Slim, A. Mezghani, and J. A. Nossek, “Training-aided frequency-domain channel estimation and equalization for single-carrier coherent optical transmission systems,” J. Light. Technol., vol. 32, no. 24, pp. 4849–4863, 2014, doi: 10.1109/JLT.2014.2358933.
  50. G. Li, F. Hu, P. Zou, C. Wang, G. R. Lin, and N. Chi, “Advanced modulation format of probabilistic shaping bit loading for 450-NM GAN laser diode based visible light communication,” Sensors (Switzerland), vol. 20, no. 21, pp. 1–12, 2020, doi: 10.3390/s20216143.

Copyright @ 2026-2017 IRJIET. All Right Reserved.

Developed by Byzero Technologies