International Research Journal of Innovations in Engineering and Technology - IRJIET International Open Access, Monthly, Peer Reviewed, Reputed Journal ISSN (online): 2581-3048

Impact Factor (2025): 6.9

DOI Prefix: 10.47001/IRJIET

Modulus of Elasticity and Poisson’s Ratio of Various Metals from the on-off Tensile Testing Method

Abstract

Modulus of elasticity and Poisson's ratio are two material properties whose values are often used as input parameters in design, stress analysis and simulation of structures or machine element components. So far, the determination of both material properties uses modern methods which require quite expensive measuring instruments and measuring tools that have a high level of accuracy. In this study, the use of the on-off method in tensile testing to determine the elastic modulus of four types of metals is investigated. The four types of metal are AISI 1018 steel, AISI 1045 steel, stainless steel 304 and aluminum 1100. The results obtained show that the elastic modulus obtained is close to the reference elastic modulus value. Meanwhile, the Poisson's ratio resulting from this method is still not close to the Poisson's ratio from the reference. For this reason, measuring instruments that have higher accuracy are needed to get good results.

Country : Indonesia

1 Rusnaldy2 Susilo Adi Widyanto3 Dede Jumadi

  1. Department of Mechanical Engineering, Diponegoro University, Kampus UndipTembalang, Semarang, Indonesia
  2. Department of Mechanical Engineering, Diponegoro University, Kampus UndipTembalang, Semarang, Indonesia
  3. Department of Mechanical Engineering, Diponegoro University, Kampus UndipTembalang, Semarang, Indonesia

IRJIET, Volume 8, Issue 9, September 2024 pp. 239-244

doi.org/10.47001/IRJIET/2024.809028

Full Paper
Download

References

  1. W.D. Callister Jr, Fundamentals of Materials Science and Engineering (5th edition, John Wiley and Sons, 2001).
  2. J.R. Davis, (editor), Tensile Testing (2nd edition, ASM International, 2004).
  3. G.E Dieter, Mechanical Metallurgy (1st edition, McGraw-Hill, 1988).
  4. H. Kun, D. Medlin, ASM Handbook, Vol. 8 Mechanical Testing and Evaluation (ASM International, 2000).
  5. F.P. Beer, E.R. Johnstone, J.T. Dewolf, D.F. Mazurek, Mechanics of Materials (5th edition, McGraw-Hill, 2006).
  6. M. Ispir, A.O. Ates, A. Ilki, Low strength concrete: Stress-strain curve, modulus of elasticity and tensile strength, Structures, 38, pp. 1615-1632, 2022.
  7. J. Carrillo, J. Ramirez, J.L. Marriaga, Modulus of elasticity and Poisson's ratio of fiber-reinforced concrete in Colombia from ultrasonic pulse velocities, Journal of Building Engineering, 23, pp.18-26, 2019.
  8. A.P.Shelorkar, P.D. Jadaho, Effect of varying water cement ratio on modulus of elasticity of high-performance fibre-reinforced concrete (HPFRC), Materials Today: Proceedings, 65, pp. 784-791, 2022.
  9. A.Alsaman, C.N Dang, G.S. Prinz, W.M Hale, Evaluation of modulus of elasticity of ultra-high-performance concrete, Construction and Building Materials, 153, pp 918-928, 2017.
  10. A.I. Marques, J. Morais, P. Morais, M.R. Veiga, C. Santos, P. Candeias, J.G. Ferreira, Modulus of elasticity of mortars: Static and dynamic analyses, Construction and Building Materials, 232, pp 117216, 2020.
  11. A.K.L. Bezerra, A.R.S. Melo, I.L.B Freitas, L.F.A.L Babadopulus, J.C. Carret, J.B.Soares, Determination of modulus of elasticity and Poisson’s ratio of cementitious materials using S-wave measurements to get consistent results between static, ultrasonic and resonant testing, Construction and Building Materials, 298, pp 132456, 2023.
  12. J. Jakubowicz, Ti-Based Biomaterials: Synthesis, Properties and Applications, Materials, 13, 1696, doi:10.3390/ma13071696, 2020.
  13. E. Alabort, D. Barba, R.C. Reed, Design of metallic bone by additive manufacturing, Scripta Materialia, 164, pp. 110-114, 2019.
  14. L.C. Zhang, L.Y. Chen, A Review on Biomedical Titanium Alloys: Recent Progress and Prospect, Advanced Engineering Materials, 1801215, 2019.
  15. S. Arabnejad, B. Johnston, M. Tanzer, D. Pasini, Fully Porous 3D Printed Titanium Femoral Stem to Reduce Stress-Shielding Following Total Hip Arthroplasty, Journal of Orthopaedic Research, Vol. 35, Issue 8, pp. 1774-1783, 2017.
  16. K. Miura, N. Yamada, S. Hanada, T. K. Jung, E. Itoi, The bone tissue compatibility of a new Ti–Nb–Sn alloy with a low Young’s modulus, Acta Biomaterialia, 7, pp. 2320–2326, 2011.
  17. M. Niinomi and M. Nakai, Titanium-Based Biomaterials for Preventing Stress Shielding between Implant Devices and Bone, International Journal of Biomaterials, Volume 2011, Article ID 836587, doi:10.1155/2011/836587.
  18. M.I.Z. Ridzwan, S. Shuib, A.Y. Hassan, A.A. Shokri, M.N.M Ibrahim, Problem of Stress Shielding and Improvement to the Hip Implant Design: A Review, Journal of Medical Science, 7 (3), pp 460-467, 2007.
  19. M. Babiak, M. Gaff, A. Sikora, S. Hysek, Modulus of Elasticity in Three- and Four-Point Bending of Wood, Composite Structures,  doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compstruct.2018.07.113, 2018.
  20. L. Fang, K.E. Metzloff, R. Voigt, C.R. Loper, Jr, Characterization and Measurement of the Modulus of Elasticity of Ductile Irons, Advanced Materials Research, Vol 4-5, pp. 147-152, 1997.
  21. H.A. Sherif, F.A. Almufadi, Polymer Modulus of Elasticity and Hardness from Impact Data, Journal of Engineering Materials and Technology, Vol. 141, 011010-1, 2019.
  22. G. N. Greaves, A. L. Greer, R. S. Lakes, T. Rouxel, Poisson’s ratio and modern materials, Nature Materials, Vol 10, pp. 823-838, 2011.

Copyright @ 2026-2017 IRJIET. All Right Reserved.

Developed by Byzero Technologies