Finite Element Analysis of Trapezoid-Shape Hip Implants with Varying Acetabular Thickness under Static Loading Conditions

Abstract

The hip joint is a joint that connects the thighbone to the pelvis. Over time, these joints can deteriorate and cause problems that can compromise their function. Total hip arthroplasty (THA) is needed so that sufferers of related diseases are able to return to normal activities. This process is carried out by replacing the damaged hip joint with an artificial hip joint (hip implant) consisting of a stem, femoral head, acetabular cup and backing cup. The main focus in this study is to analyze the effect of acetabular cup thickness in different material combination on hip implant design using the finite element analysis (FEA) approach method. Using standard boundary conditions referring to ASTM F2996-13, a 3-dimensional analysis using the finite element method was carried out to determine the influence of acetabular cup thickness on hip implants. MoP and MoM compositions with Co-Cr and UHMWPE materials were used in this analysis. The parameters used are taperBody von-Mises stress, total deformation and von-Mises stress on all implants. This research show that increasing the thickness of the acetabular cup has the same effect as increasing the fermoral head diameter of the implant and that implants with the highest acetabular cup thickness have better performance. However, increasing the thickness of the acetabular cup did not have a significant impact on the overall stress distribution contour of the implant.

Country : Indonesia

1 Mohammad Tauviqirrahman2 Muchammad3 Aminuddin Setyo Widodo

  1. Mechanical Engineering Department, Faculty of Engineering, Diponegoro University, Jl. Prof. H. Soedarto, SH, Tembalang-Semarang 50275, Indonesia
  2. Mechanical Engineering Department, Faculty of Engineering, Diponegoro University, Jl. Prof. H. Soedarto, SH, Tembalang-Semarang 50275, Indonesia
  3. Mechanical Engineering Department, Faculty of Engineering, Diponegoro University, Jl. Prof. H. Soedarto, SH, Tembalang-Semarang 50275, Indonesia

IRJIET, Volume 9, Issue 10, October 2025 pp. 65-74

doi.org/10.47001/IRJIET/2025.910010

References

  1. Aherwar, A., Singh, A.K. & Patnaik, A., 2016. Current and future biocompatibility aspects of biomaterials for hip prosthesis. AIMS Bioengineering, 3(1), pp. 23–43.
  2. Alkhatib, S.E., Mehboob, H. & Tarlochan, F., 2019. Finite element analysis of porous titanium alloy hip stem to evaluate the biomechanical performance during walking and stair climbing. Journal of Bionic Engineering, 16, pp. 1103–1115.
  3. ASTM International, 2013. ASTM F2996-13 Standard Practice for Finite Element Analysis (FEA) of Non-Modular Metallic Orthopaedic Hip Femoral Stems. ASTM International: West Conshohocken, PA, USA.
  4. Bandyopadhyay, A., Traxel, K.D., Avila, J.D., Mitra, I. & Bose, S., 2020. CoCr alloys. In: J.D. Bronzino & D.R. Peterson, eds., Biomaterials Science, 3rd ed. Amsterdam: Academic Press, pp. 257–269.
  5. Bhawe, A.K., Shah, K.M., Somani, S., Shenoy, B.S., Bhat, N.S., Zuber, M. & Chethan, K.N., 2022. Static structural analysis of the effect of change in femoral head sizes used in total hip arthroplasty using finite element method. Cogent Engineering, 9, pp. 1–13.
  6. Chethan, K.N., Zuber, M., Bhat, N.S. & Shenoy, B.S., 2021. Finite element analysis of hip implant with varying taper neck lengths under static loading conditions. Computer Methods and Programs in Biomedicine, 208, pp. 1–7.
  7. Chethan, K.N., Zuber, M., Bhat, N.S. & Shenoy, B.S., 2022. Optimized trapezoidal-shaped hip implant for total hip arthroplasty using finite element analysis. Cogent Engineering, 7, pp. 1–14.
  8. Chethan, K.N., Zuber, M., Shenoy, B.S. & Kini, C.R., 2019. Static structural analysis of different stem designs used in total hip arthroplasty using finite element method. Heliyon, 5.
  9. Cunha, A., Yanik, Y., Olivieri, C. & da Silva, S., 2024. Tresca versus Von Mises: Which failure criterion is more conservative in a probabilistic context? Journal of Applied Mechanics, 91(11), pp. 111008.
  10. Erdemir, A., Guess, T.M., Halloran, J., Tadepalli, S.C. & Morrison, T.M., 2012. Considerations for reporting finite element analysis studies in biomechanics. Journal of Biomechanics, 45, pp. 625–633.
  11. Gotman, I., 2021. Biomechanical and tribological aspects of orthopaedic implants. In: G.P. Ostermeyer, V.L. Popov, E.V. Shilko & O.S. Vasiljeva, eds., Multiscale Biomechanics and Tribology of Inorganic and Organic Systems. Cham: Springer Nature, pp. 25–44.
  12. Guo, L., Naghavi, S.A., Wang, Z., Varma, S.N., Han, Z., Yao, Z., Wang, L., Liu, C., 2022. On the design evolution of hip implants: A review. Materials & Design, 216, pp. 1–18.
  13. Iyer, K.M., 2021. The hip joint, 2nd ed. Jenny Stanford Publishing Pte. Ltd.: New York, USA.
  14. Jamari, J., Ammarullah, M.I., Santoso, G., Sugiharto, S., Supriyono, T., Prakoso, A.T., Basri, H. & van der Heide, E., 2023. Computational contact pressure prediction of CoCrMo, SS 316L and Ti6Al4V femoral head against UHMWPE acetabular cup under gait cycle. Journal of Functional Biomaterials, 13, pp. 64.
  15. Jamari, J., Saputra, E., Anwar, I.B., Ismail, R., van der Heide, E., 2017. Finite element study of the effect of UHMWPE liner thickness on the contact area and stress distribution in a bipolar hip joint. Materials Science and Engineering, 202, pp. 1–8.
  16. Jamari, J., Ismail, R., Bayuseno, A.P., 2021. Finite element analysis of artificial hip joint implant made from stainless steel 316L. Bali Medical Journal, 10, pp. 448–452.
  17. Kiernan, S., Geijer, M., Sundberg, M. &Flivik, G., 2020. Effect of symmetrical restoration for the migration of uncemented total hip arthroplasty: A randomized RSA study with 75 patients and 5-year follow-up. Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Research, 15, pp. 225.
  18. Lee, C.K., Kwan, M.K., Merican, A.M., Ng, W.M., Saw, L.B., Teh, K.K., Krishnan, M., Ramiah, R., 2014. Femoral head diameter in the Malaysian population. Singapore Medical Journal, 55, pp. 436–438.
  19. Merola, M., Affatato, S., 2019. Materials for hip prostheses: A review of wear and loading considerations. Materials, 12, pp. 495.
  20. Ruggiero, A., D'Amato, R., Affatato, S., 2019. Comparison of meshing strategies in THR finite element modelling. Mathematics, 12, pp. 2332.
  21. Sabatini, A.L., Goswami, T., 2008. Hip implants VII: Finite element analysis and optimization of cross-sections. Materials & Design, 29, pp. 1438–1446.
  22. Soliman, M.M., Chowdhury, M.E., Islam, M.T., Musharavati, F., Nabil, M., Hafizh, M., Khandakar, A., Mahmud, S., Nezhad, E.Z., Shuzan, M.N.I., Abir, F.F., 2022. A review of biomaterials and associated performance metrics analysis in pre-clinical finite element model and in implementation stages for total hip implant system. Polymers, 14, pp. 4308.
  23. Tauviqirrahman, M., Ammarullah, M.I., Jamari, J., Saputra, E., Winarni, T.I., Kurniawan, F.D., Shiddiq, S.A., van der Heide, E., 2023. Analysis of contact pressure in a 3D model of dual-mobility hip joint prosthesis under a gait cycle. Scientific Reports, 13, pp. 3564.
  24. Taqriban, R.B., Ismail, R., Jamari, J., Bayuseno, A.P., 2021. Finite element analysis of artificial hip joint implant made from stainless steel 316L. Bali Medical Journal, 10, pp. 448–452.
  25. Varacallo, M., Luo, T.D. & Johanson, N.A., 2023. Total Hip Arthroplasty Techniques [online]. Available at: https://www.example.com/article [Accessed 24 June. 2024].
  26. Wibowo, B.S., Wijaya, P.N., Tauviqirrahman, M., Ismail, R., Muchammad, J., 2019. A 3-dimensional computational fluid-structure interaction analysis in the hip-joint prosthesis during solat (prayer) activity. Jurnal Tribologi, 20, pp. 125–141.