International Research Journal of Innovations in Engineering and Technology - IRJIET International Open Access, Monthly, Peer Reviewed, Reputed Journal ISSN (online): 2581-3048

Impact Factor (2025): 6.9

DOI Prefix: 10.47001/IRJIET

Modeling and Optimizing the Use of Aerobic Bioreactors for Sustained Removal of Pahs from Crude Oil Sludge

Okuroghoboye D. ItughaDepartment of Civil Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, Federal University Otuoke, Bayelsa State, NigeriaAndy O. IbejeDepartment of Civil Engineering, Imo State University, Owerri, NigeriaEsther C. UdochukwuDepartment of Chemical Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, Federal University Otuoke, Bayelsa State, Nigeria

Vol 9 No 10 (2025): Volume 9, Issue 10, October 2025 | Pages: 284-291

International Research Journal of Innovations in Engineering and Technology

OPEN ACCESS | Research Article | Published Date: 13-11-2025

doi Logo doi.org/10.47001/IRJIET/2025.910035

pdf iconFull Text PDF
Abstract

The presence of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs) in air, soil sediments and water resources can be critical concern to human health and risk of fatal diseases. PAHs are organic chemicals usually with two or more benzene rings, so have potential toxic effects on humans due to their carcinogenic, teratogenic, and mutagenic risks, hence their removal from contaminated environments is crucial. This study explores the use of bioreactors from crude oil sludge for the optimal removal of PAHs. The Box-Wilson experimental design was adopted to ascertain the associated variables such as, dosage of oxygen, PAHs concentration and pH. To determine the effect of experimental factors on the bioreactor process, the method was also applied at different oxygen dosage, PAH concentration, and pH of the sludge suspension in the treatment process. A second-order polynomial model was incorporated to fit the experimental data and enable optimize the treatment discretely on a laboratory scale (implying working volume less than 1 liter) mechanically stirred-tank bioreactor. The results of the analyses show that the most functional requirement and so advantageous in the treatment process was 0.4g, 20mg/L and 6 for oxygen dosage, PAHs concentration and pH respectively. This implies that the mathematical model efficiently simulated the treatment process hence, enhanced the performance of aerobic bioreactor plants in removing PAHs from crude oil sludge.

Keywords

PAHs, crude oil sludge, aerobic bioreactors, oxygen dosage, bioremediation


Citation of this Article

Okuroghoboye D. Itugha, Andy O. Ibeje, & Esther C. Udochukwu. (2025). Modeling and Optimizing the Use of Aerobic Bioreactors for Sustained Removal of Pahs from Crude Oil Sludge. International Research Journal of Innovations in Engineering and Technology - IRJIET, 9(10), 284-291. Article DOI https://doi.org/10.47001/IRJIET/2025.910035

Licence Copyright (c) 2026 International Research Journal of Innovations in Engineering and Technology creative common licence This work is licensed under Creative common Attribution Non Commercial 4.0 Internation Licence
References
  1. Atlas, R.M. and C.E. Cerniglia 2015. Bioremediation of petroleum pollutants: Diversity and environmental aspects of hydrocarbon biodegradation. BioScience, 45: 332-338.
  2. ATSDR, Toxicological Profile for Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons, ATSDR, Atlanta, 1995.
  3. Euiso, C. and Euisin, L. 2018. Temperature effects on biological nutrient removal system with weak municipal wastewater. Water Sci Technol. 37(9): 219-220.
  4. Salameh, M. F. and Kabrick, R. M. 2012. Treatment of Petroleum Oily Sludges in Liquid/Solid Contact Reactors – Results of Batch Testing, in: Proceedings of the 46th Ind. Waste Conf., West Lafayette, Indiana, Purdue University.
  5. SPDC. 2010. Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA) of Egbema, Egbema West and Ugada Fields Integrated Oil and Gas Development Project. The Shell Petroleum Development Company Limited, Port Harcourt, Nigeria.
  6. E. Manoli, C. Samara, The removal of Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons in the wastewater treatment process: Experimental calculations and model predictions, Environ. Pollut. 151 (2008) 477–485. doi:10.1016/j.envpol.2007.04.009.
  7. M. Blanchard, M.J. Teil, D. Ollivon, L. Legenti and M. Chevreuil, Polycyclic Aromatic hydrocarbons and polychlorobiphenyls in wastewater and sewage sludges from the Paris area (France), Environ. Res., 95 (2004) 184–197.
  8. A.J. Sweetman and K.C. Jones, Declining PCB concentrationsin the UK atmosphere: evidence and possible causes, Environ. Sci. Technol., 34 (2000) 863–869.
  9. R.A. Kanaly, S. Harayama, Biodegradation of high-molecular-weight polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons by bacteria, J. Bacteriol. 182 (2000) 2059–2067.
  10. Vidonish, J.E.; Zygourakis, K.; Masiello, C.A.; Sabadell, G.; Alvarez, P.J. Thermal treatment of hydrocarbon-impacted soils: A review of technology innovation for sustainable remediation. Engineering 2016, 2, 426–437.
  11. Jing, L.; Chen, B.; Zhang, B.; Zheng, J.; Liu, B. Naphthalene degradation in seawater by UV irradiation: The effects of fluence rate, salinity, temperature and initial concentration. Mar. Pollut. Bull. 2014, 81, 149–156.
  12. Abdel-Shafy, H.I.; Mansour, M.S. A review on polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons: Source, environmental impact, effect on human health and remediation. Egypt. J. Pet. 2016, 25, 107–123.
  13. R.L. Crawford, D.L. Crawford, Bioremediation: Principles and Applications, Cambridge University Press, 2005.
  14. Xu, X.; Liu, W.; Tian, S.; Wang, W.; Qi, Q.; Jiang, P.; Gao, X.; Li, F.; Li, H.; Yu, H. Petroleum hydrocarbon-degrading bacteria for theremediation of oil pollution under aerobic conditions: A perspective analysis. Front. Microbiol. 2018, 9, 2885.
  15. Xu, D.; Zhang, K.; Li, B.-G.; Mbadinga, S.M.; Zhou, L.; Liu, J.-F.; Yang, S.-Z.; Gu, J.-D.; Mu, B. Z. Simulation of in situ oil reservoirconditions in a laboratory bioreactor testing for methanogenic conversion of crude oil and analysis of the microbial community. Int. Biodeterior. Biodegrad. 2019, 136, 24–33.
  16. R.F. Lewis, SITE Demonstration of Slurry-Phase Biodegradation of PAH Contaminated Soil, Air Waste. 43 (1993) 503–508. doi:10.1080/1073161X.1993.10467149
  17. Li, S.; Luo, J.; Hang, X.; Zhao, S.; Wan, Y. (2019). Removal of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons by nanofiltration membranes: Rejection and fouling mechanisms. J. Membr. Sci. 2019, 582, 264–273.
  18. Li Y., Chen Y., Wu J. (2019). Enhancement of methane production in anaerobic digestion process: A review. Applied Energy, 240, 120–137.
  19. E. Collina, G. Bestetti, P. Di Gennaro, A. Franzetti, F. Gugliersi, M. Lasagni, D. Pitea, Naphthalene biodegradation kinetics in an aerobic slurry-phase bioreactor, Environ. Int. 31 (2005) 167–171. doi:10.1016/j.envint.2004.09.011.
  20. P.-H. Lee, S.K. Ong, J. Golchin, G.S. Nelson, Use of solvents to enhance PAH biodegradation of coal tar, Water Res. 35 (2001) 3941–3949.
  21. A.K. Haritash, C.P. Kaushik, Biodegradation aspects of Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons (PAHs): A review, J. Hazard. Mater. 169 (2009) 1–15. doi:10.1016/j.jhazmat.2009.03.137.
  22. K.T. Semple, A.W.J. Morriss, G.I. Paton, Bioavailability of hydrophobic organic contaminants in soils:fundamental concepts and techniques for analysis, Eur. J. Soil Sci. 54 (2003) 809–818.
  23. F. Fava, S. Berselli, P. Conte, A. Piccolo, L. Marchetti, Effects of humic substances and soya lecithin onthe aerobic bioremediation of a soil historically contaminated by polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs), Biotechnol. Bioeng. 88 (2004) 214–223. doi:10.1002/bit.20225.
  24. A.Giordano, L. Stante, F. Pirozzi, R. Cesaro, G. Bortone, Sequencing batch reactor performance treating PAH contaminated lagoon sediments, J. Hazard. Mater. 119 (2005) 159–166.doi:10.1016/j.jhazmat.2004.12.002.
  25. Dat N. D., Chang MB. 2017. Review on characteristics of PAHs in atmosphere, anthropogenic sourcesand control technologies. Science of the Total Environment, 60, 682–693.

Copyright @ 2026 IRJIET. All Right Reserved.

Licensed underCreative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.