Optimization of Pellet Press Design by Converting a Dual-Roller into a Three-Roller Mechanism to Improve Production Efficiency

Abstract

The pelletizing process plays a critical role in both feed and biomass industries, as it determines product quality, density, and overall production efficiency. Conventional pellet presses equipped with dual-roller mechanisms typically suffer from limitations in pressure distribution, production capacity, and pellet shape uniformity. This study aims to design and optimize a pellet press by modifying the roller configuration from a dual-roller to a three-roller system in order to enhance pelletizing efficiency. The research methodology includes mechanical design through analytical calculations and numerical analysis using CAD-based modeling. The results indicate that the addition of a third roller increases the effective compression area by 250% and boosts the average production capacity by approximately 260% compared with the dual-roller system. These findings demonstrate that the three-roller modification significantly improves pelletizing performance in terms of mechanical efficiency and product quality, achieving a break-even point (BEP) within only a single day of operation.

Country : Indonesia

1 Sulardjaka2 Norman Iskandar3 Muhammad Ridwan Ghifari4 Muhammad Zidan Ali5 Thirafi Nabil Fawwaz

  1. Mechanical Engineering Department, Diponegoro University, Semarang, Indonesia
  2. Mechanical Engineering Department, Diponegoro University, Semarang, Indonesia
  3. Mechanical Engineering Department, Diponegoro University, Semarang, Indonesia
  4. Mechanical Engineering Department, Diponegoro University, Semarang, Indonesia
  5. Mechanical Engineering Department, Diponegoro University, Semarang, Indonesia

IRJIET, Volume 9, Issue 11, November 2025 pp. 296-300

doi.org/10.47001/IRJIET/2025.911038

References

  1. Jayal, A. D., Badurdeen, F., Dillon, O. W., Jr., & Jawahir, I. S. (2010). Sustainable manufacturing: Modeling and optimization challenges at the product, process and system levels. CIRP Journal of Manufacturing Science and Technology, 2(3), 144–152. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cirpJ.2010.03.006.
  2. You, X., Tulpan, D., Malpass, J., & Ellis, N. (2022). Pellet quality and feed utilization in animal nutrition. Animal Feed Science and Technology, 291, 115377. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anscip.2022.07.472.
  3. Sims, R. E. H., Hastings, A., Schlamadinger, B., Taylor, G., & Smith, P. (2010). Energy crops: Current status and future prospects. Global Change Biology Bioenergy, 2(1), 1–19.10.1111/j.1365-2486.2006.01163.x.
  4. Mortadha, H., Kerrouchi, H. B., Al-Othman, A., & Tawalbeh, M. (2025). A Comprehensive Review of Biomass Pellets and Their Role in Sustainable Energy: Production, Properties, Environment, Economics, and Logistics. Waste and Biomass Valorization, 16(9), 4507-4539. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12649-024-02873-x
  5. Garetti, M., & Taisch, M. (2012). Sustainable manufacturing: Trends and research challenges. Production Planning & Control, 23(2–3), 83–104. https://doi.org/10.1080/09537287.2011.591619
  6. Bajwa, D. S., Peterson, T., Sharma, N., Shojaeiarani, J., & Bajwa, S. G. (2018). A review of densified solid biomass for energy production. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 96, 296–305.DOI: 10.1016/j.rser.2018.07.040.
  7. Olugboji, O., Abolarin, M. S., Owolewa, O., & Ajani, K. (2015). Design and performance evaluation of a pelletizer. International Journal of Engineering Research and Applications, 5(1), 35–40.DOI :  10.14445/22315381/IJETT-V22P235.
  8. Kaliyan, N., & Morey, R. V. (2009). Factors affecting strength and durability of densified biomass products. Biomass and Bioenergy, 33(3), 337–359.http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.biombioe.2008.08.005.
  9. Tumuluru, J. S. (2014). Pelletization of agricultural biomass. Bioengineering, 1(1), 1–15.
  10. Duflou, J. R., Sutherland, J. W., Dornfeld, D., Herrmann, C., Jeswiet, J., Kara, S., Hauschild, M., & Kellens, K. (2012). Towards energy and resource efficient manufacturing: A processes and systems approach. CIRP Journal of Manufacturing Science and Technology, 4(2), 220–235.
  11. Holm, J. K., Henriksen, U. B., Hustad, J. E., & Sørensen, L. H. (2006). Toward an understanding of controlling parameters in softwood and hardwood pellets production. Energy & Fuels, 20(6), 2686–2694. https://doi.org/10.1021/ef0503360.
  12. Stelte, W., Holm, J. K., Sanadi, A. R., Barsberg, S., Ahrenfeldt, J., & Henriksen, U. B. (2011). A study of bonding and failure mechanisms in fuel pellets from different biomass resources. Biomass & Bioenergy, 35(2), 910-918. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biombioe.2010.11.003.
  13. Tokopedia. (n.d.). Mesin pencetak pelet pakan 120 kg. Retrieved November 14, 2025, from https://www.tokopedia.com/mesindoteknik/mesin-pencetak-pelet-pakan-120-kg-1730914999146153620
  14. Gutowski, T., Dahmus, J., & Thiriez, A. (2006). Electrical energy requirements for manufacturing processes. CIRP Annals, 55(1), 13–16
  15. Abdellatif MMA. Green Production and Sustainable Manufacturing: A Comprehensive Review. Premier Journal of Engineering 2024:1;100002.
  16. Hassan, M., Usman, N., Hussain, M., Yousaf, A., Khattak, M. A., Yousaf, S., Mishr, R. S., Ahmad, S., Rehman, F., & Rashedi, A. (2023). Environmental and Socio-Economic Assessment of Biomass Pellets Biofuel in Hazara Division, Pakistan. Sustainability, 15(15), 12089. https://doi.org/10.3390/su151512089