Effect of X-Ray Exposure and Sodium Azide (NaN3) Treatments on Germination Growth and Yield of Maize (Zea Mays L.) in Mubi Adamawa State Nigeria

Abstract

A Research was carried out at the Faculty of Agriculture Department of Crop Science Teaching and Research Farm, and Botany Laboratory of Adamawa State University, Mubi, during the 2024 cropping season to determine the effect of X-ray bombardment and sodium azide on the germination, growth and yield of maize (SAMMAZ 51) an open pollinated variety. The treatments consisted of the following; T1=SA10.01% T2 = SA20.02% T3= SA30.03% T4= X-ray 5sec, T5= X-ray 10 sec, T6=X-ray 15 sec and T7= control. The Experiment was laid out in a Randomized Complete Block Design (RCBD) in three replicates. Data were collected on days to first germination, germination percentage, number of leaves, plants height, days to 50% tasseling and silking, number of cobs per plot, number of rows per cob, cob length (cm), seed yield per plot(g), 1000 seed weight (g)  and seed yield (kg ha-1). The data collected was subjected to Analysis of Variance using Statistical Package for Scientist and Engineers (SPSE), significant means were separated using Duncan Multiple Range Test (DMRT) at P≤0.05. The results showed that bombarding  maize seeds with X-ray for 10 seconds prior to planting  performed better in most of  growth and yield characters observed in this study the characters were,  days to first germination with 3 days, germination percentage 72.91 %, number of leaves and plant height at 2 and 4 weeks after sowing as 5.53 and 10.07,  18.13cm and 31.27 cm  respectively number of cobs per plot  5,  number of rows per cob 12.73, seed yield  per plot 325.08 (g), 1000 seed weight 217.08 (g), and seed yield (kg ha-1) 543.78.This study therefore revealed that bombarding maize seed (SAMMAZ 51) with X-ray for 10 seconds prior to planting can enhances germination, growth and yield of maize. Hence X-ray can serve as an important mutagenic agent for creating variability in maize.

Country : Nigeria

1 Timon David2 Zakawa N. N3 Mohammed Rabiyat

  1. Department of Botany, Adamawa State University, P. M. B 25 Mubi, Adamawa State, Nigeria
  2. Department of Botany, Adamawa State University, P. M. B 25 Mubi, Adamawa State, Nigeria
  3. Department of Botany, Adamawa State University, P. M. B 25 Mubi, Adamawa State, Nigeria

IRJIET, Volume 9, Issue 2, February 2025 pp. 33-40

doi.org/10.47001/IRJIET/2025.902006

References

  1. Adamu A.K and Aliyu H. (2007). Morphological effects of sodium azide in tomatoe (Lycopersicon esculentum Mill). Science World Journal 2:9-12.
  2. Akinyosoye, S. T. (2021). Effect of Sodium Azide on Seed Germination and Callus Induction in Some Maize (Zea mays L.) Varieties. Nigerian Journal of Seed Science (NJSS) 4 (2) 66 - 75 2020.
  3. Al Gawwad and Makka A (2009). Effect of chemical mutagens on Mirabilis jalapa. M.Sc. Thesis, Floriculture, Faculty of Agriculture, Alexandria University.
  4. Al-Qurainy, F. and Khan, S. (2009).Mutagenic effects of sodium azide and its application in crop improvement. World Applied Science Journal, 6: 1589-1601.
  5. Arulbacachandran, D., Mullainathan, L., Velu, S., Thilagavathi, C. (2010). Genetic variability, heritability and genetic advance of quantitative traits in black gram by effects of mutation in field trail. African Journal of Biotechnology, 9 (19): 2731 – 2735.
  6. Boureima S, Diouf M, Slime RS, Diop T, Vandamme P, and Cagirgan M I (2009): Radio sensitivity of African sesame cultivars to gamma-rays. Turkish Journal of Field Crops 14(2), 181-190.
  7. Çagırgan, M. (2001): Mutation techniques in sesame (Sesamum indicum L.) for intensive management: Confirmed mutants. In: Sesame Improvement by Induced Mutations. IAEA-TECDOC-1195, IAEA, Vienna, pp. 31–40.
  8. El-Nashar YIA (2006). Effect of chemical mutagens (sodium azide and diethyl sulphate) on growth, flowering and induced variability in Amaranthus caudatus L. and A. hypochondriacus L. Ph.D. Thesis, Floriculture, Faculty of Agriculture, Alexandria University.
  9. Emmanuel Mbah (2022). Improvement of growth yield and nutritional status of maize (Zea mays L.) through X-ray bombardment of seed Palar Povet 2022 59(3) 91-103.
  10. FAO/IAEA (2015). Induced plant mutations in the genomics era. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, Rome. 2005; 262-265.
  11. Food Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. FAOSTAT Statistical Database. FAO (2021). Available online at: https://www.fao.org/statistics/en/ (accessed January 22, 2022).
  12. Grote, U., Fasse, A., Nguyen, T. T., and Erenstein, O. (2021). Food Security and the Dynamics of Wheat and Maize Value Chains in Africa and Asia. Frontiers in Sustainable Food Systems, 4, 617009. https://doi.org/10.3389/fsufs.2020.617009
  13. Hoballah, A.A. (2001): Selection and agronomic evaluation of induced mutant lines of sesame. In: Sesame Improvement by Induced Mutations. IAEA-TECDOC-1195, IAEA, Vienna, pp. 137–150.
  14. Holme I. B., Gregersen P. L., Brinch-Pedersen H. (2019). Induced genetic variation in crop plants by random or targeted mutagenesis: convergence and differences. Front. Plant Sci. 10:1468. 10.3389/fpls.2019.01468.
  15. IAEA. IAEA Mutant Variety Database. Available online at: http://mvd.iaea.org (accessed July 28, 2021).
  16. Kamara, A.Y., S.U. Ewansiha, and A. Menkir. (2014). Assessment of nitrogen uptake and utilization in drought-tolerant and Striga resistant tropical maize varieties. Archives of Agronomy and Soil Science 60: 195–207. doi:10.1080 /03650340.2013.783204.
  17. Marcu, D., Cristea, V. and Daraban, L. (2013). Dose dependent effects of Gamma radiation on Lettuce seedlings. International Journal of Radiation Biology, 89(3):219-223.
  18. Mostafa, G.G., 2011, Effect of sodium azide on the growth and variability induction in Helianthus annuus L, Intional Journal of Plant Breeding and Genetics.  5: 76-85 https://doi.org/10.3923/ijpbg.2011.76.85.
  19. Moussa, H.R. (2006). Role of gamma radiation in regulation of NO3 level in rocket (Eruca vesicaria subsp sativa) plants. Russian Journal of Plant Physiology, 53:193-197.
  20. Nura S, Adamu AK, Mu‟Azu S, Dangora DB, Fagwalawa LD (2013). Morphological Characterization of Colchicine-induced Mutant in Sesame (Sesamum indicum L.). Journal of Biological Sciences 13:277-82.
  21. Roychowdhury R, Tah J. (2011).  Chemical mutagenic action on seed germination and related seed-derived explants through colchicine treatments in Catharanthus roseus (L.) G. Don.
  22. Shiferaw, B., Prasanna, B., Hellin, J., and Banziger, M. (2011). Crops that feed the world 6. Past successes and future challenges to the role played by maize in global food security. Food Security, 3, 307–327. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12571-011-0140-5.
  23. Shu Q. Y., Forster B. P., Nakagawa H. (2012). Plant Mutation Breeding and Biotechnology. CAB International and FAO.
  24. Wongpiyasatid A., S. Chotechuen, P. Hormchan, S. Ngampongsai, and W. Promcham, (2000). Induced mutations in mungbean breeding: Regional yield trial of mungbean mutant lines, Kasetsart Journal of Natural Science. 34: 443-449.
  25. Wongyai, W., Saengkaewsook, W., and Veerawudh, J. (2001): Sesame mutation induction: improvement of nonshattering capsule by using gamma rays and EMS. In: Sesame Improvement by Induced Mutations. IAEA-TECDOC-1195, IAEA, Vienna, pp. 71–78.