Quantitative Analysis of Electrohysterogram Features for Pregnancy Monitoring

Sandeep GuptaCollege of Engineering and Management, Punjabi University Neighbourhood Campus, Punjab, IndiaVibha AggarwalUniversity College, Barnala, Punjab, IndiaManjeet Singh PatterhDepartment of Electronics and Communication Engineering, Punjabi University, Patiala, Punjab, IndiaLovepreet SinghUniversity College, Barnala, Punjab, India

Vol 9 No 4 (2025): Volume 9, Issue 4, April 2025 | Pages: 12-15

International Research Journal of Innovations in Engineering and Technology

OPEN ACCESS | Research Article | Published Date: 07-04-2025

doi Logo doi.org/10.47001/IRJIET/2025.904002

Abstract

Electrohysterogram (EHG) signals have emerged as a valuable tool for analyzing uterine activity and predicting pregnancy outcomes. This study investigates key statistical features extracted from EHG signals and examines their significance in differentiating pregnancy cases. A comprehensive statistical analysis, including analysis of variance (ANOVA) and Tukey's post-hoc test, was conducted on twelve extracted features. Results indicate that six features—standard deviation, root mean square (RMS), entropy, spectral entropy, Higuchi fractal dimension (HFD), and approximate entropy (ApEn)—exhibited significant differences among the cases. These findings highlight the potential of these features in distinguishing pregnancy conditions and improving predictive models for preterm birth risk.

Keywords

Electrohysterogram (EHG), analysis of variance (ANOVA), Higuchi fractal dimension (HFD), approximate entropy (ApEn)


Citation of this Article

Sandeep Gupta, Vibha Aggarwal, Manjeet Singh Patterh, & Lovepreet Singh. (2025). Quantitative Analysis of Electrohysterogram Features for Pregnancy Monitoring. International Research Journal of Innovations in Engineering and Technology - IRJIET, 9(4), 12-15. Article DOI https://doi.org/10.47001/IRJIET/2025.904002

References
  1. L. K. Bruce, D. González, S. Dasgupta, and B. L. Smarr, “Biometrics of complete human pregnancy recorded by wearable devices,” Aug. 12, 2024, Nature Portfolio. doi: 10.1038/s41746-024-01183-9.
  2. A.Kumar and P. B. Jaju, “Admission test cardiotocography in labour as a predictor of foetal outcome in high risk pregnancies,” Mar. 06, 2019, Medip Academy. doi: 10.18203/2320-1770.ijrcog20190981.
  3. N. G. Ravindra et al., “Deep representation learning identifies associations between physical activity and sleep patterns during pregnancy and prematurity,” Sep. 28, 2023, Nature Portfolio. doi: 10.1038/s41746-023-00911-x.
  4. A.Gayasen, S. K. Dua, A. Sengupta, and D. Nagchoudhuri, “Effect of non-linearity in predicting doppler waveforms through a novel model,” Sep. 18, 2003, BioMed Central. doi: 10.1186/1475-925x-2-16.
  5. Jinshan Xu, Zhenqin Chen, Hangxiao Lou, Guojiang Shen, Alain Pumir, “Review on EHG signal analysis and its application in preterm diagnosis,” Biomedical Signal Processing and Control, Volume 71, Part B,2022,doi.org/10.1016/j.bspc.2021.103231.
  6. Martim Almeida, Helena Mouriño, Arnaldo G. Batista, Sara Russo, Filipa Esgalhado, Catarina R. Palma dos Reis, Fátima Serrano, Manuel Ortigueira, “Electrohysterography extracted features dependency on anthropometric and pregnancy factors”, Biomedical Signal Processing and Control, Volume 75,2022,doi.org/10.1016/j.bspc.2022.103556.
  7. Zhang Y, Hao D, Yang L, Zhou X, Ye-Lin Y, Yang Y. Assessment of Features between Multichannel Electrohysterogram for Differentiation of Labors. Sensors. 2022; 22(9):3352. doi.org/10.3390/s22093352.
  8. Jager, F. An open dataset with electrohysterogram records of pregnancies ending in induced and cesarean section delivery. Sci Data 10, 669 (2023). doi.org/10.1038/s41597-023-02581-6.
  9. S. Gupta, V. Aggarwal. MS Patterh, L. Singh, “Analysis of Foetal Phonocardiography and Clinical Outcomes: A Data-Driven Analysis Using IISc Database”, International Research Journal of Modernization in Engineering Technology and Science, Volume:07, Issue:03, March-2025, pp-7864-7867. doi.10.56726/IRJMETS70309.