Analyzing the Impact of Node Mobility Patterns on Fisheye State Routing with SDN-Enabled MANETs

Abstract

Mobile Ad Hoc Networks (MANETs) are decentralized networks characterized by dynamic topologies resulting from continuous node mobility, which poses significant challenges to routing and maintaining seamless communication. Routing protocols in such networks are designed to adapt to constant topological changes. The Fisheye State Routing (FSR) protocol is a proactive routing protocol which aims to minimize routing overhead while maintaining path accuracy by adjusting the frequency of routing updates based on node proximity. However, its distributed nature limits its responsiveness in highly mobile environments.

In light of these challenges, Software Defined Networking (SDN) emerges as a promising solution by providing centralized control and a general view for network, thereby enhancing adaptability of routing protocols within the dynamic nature of MANETs. In this study, we conducted performance analysis of the FSR protocol in two phases: first, using the FSR protocol alone, and then reanalyzing it within an SDN framework to benefit from centralized management capabilities.

The study involved modeling and simulating four different node mobility patterns—Random, Deterministic, Directed, and Network-wide—across five different speed levels. Simulations were conducted using the NetLogo environment, and performance was evaluated based on key metrics, including traffic load, throughput, routing overhead, packet loss, average delay, and delivery ratios.

This research goal to offer a deeper expertise of the effect of node transferring patterns on the overall performance of the FSR protocol and to assess the capacity enhancements whilst integrating FSR with SDN. The anticipated results contribute to the progress of greater adaptive and optimized routing protocols for exceptionally dynamic, infrastructure-much less community environments.

Country : Iraq

1 Tuhfa Sabry Mahmood2 Manar Younis Ahmed

  1. Department of Computer Science, University of Mosul, Mosul-Iraq
  2. University of Ninevah, Mosul-Iraq

IRJIET, Volume 9, Issue 5, May 2025 pp. 104-120

doi.org/10.47001/IRJIET/2025.905014

References

  1. AL AJRAWI, Shams; TRAN, Bang. Mobile wireless ad-hoc network routing protocols comparison for real-time military application. Spatial Information Research, 2024, 32.1: 119-129.‏
  2. Sun Allen C. Design and Implementation of Fisheye Routing Protocol for Mobile Ad Hoc Networks Diss. Massachusetts Institute of Technology, 2000.
  3. KHADER, Osama HS. Fisheye State Routing improvement in Mobile Ad Hoc Networks.
  4. AHMED, I. M.; KASHMOOLA, M. Y. Investigated insider and outsider attacks on the federated learning systems. In: IEEE International Conference on Communication, Networks and Satellite (COMNETSAT), 2022, November. p. 438-443.
  5. BINTI RASIDI, N. I.; AL-SANJARY, O. I.; KASHMOLA, M. Y.; AIK, K. L. T. Development on Autonomous Object Tracker Robot using Raspberry Pi. In: IEEE 10th Conference on Systems, Process & Control (ICSPC), 2022, December. p. 29-33.
  6. AL-SANJARY, O. I.; IDZHAR, B. A. B.; KASHMOLA, M. Y. Indoor Safety Monitoring and Auto Temperature Detector for COVID-19. In: IEEE 10th Conference on Systems, Process & Control (ICSPC), 2022, December. p. 34-38.
  7. Sathish S., K. Thangavel, and S. Boopathi. "Comparative analysis of DSR, FSR and ZRP routing protocols in MANET." International conference on information and Network Technology IPCSIT vol. Vol. 4. 2011.
  8. ALASH, Hayder Majid Abdulhameed. Impact of mobility models on routing protocols for various traffic classes in mobile ad hoc networks. Kent State University, 2016.
  9. HASSAN, Muhammad Abul, et al. Unmanned Aerial Vehicles Routing Formation using fisheye state routing for flying ad-hoc networks. In: Proceedings of the 4th International Conference on Future Networks and Distributed Systems. 2020. p. 1-7.
  10. HASSAN, M. Abul, et al. Energy efficient hierarchical based fish eye state routing protocol for flying ad-hoc networks. Indonesian Journal of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science, 2021, 21.1: 465-471.‏
  11. Razouqi, Qutaiba, et al. "Extended Comparison and Performance Analysis for Mobile Ad-Hoc Networks Routing Protocols Based on Different Traffic Load Patterns and Performance Metrics." Electronics 13.14 (2024): 2877.
  12. Wang, Zifei, and Mingchuan Zhang. "Review of Routing Protocols for Mobile Ad Hoc Networks." International Journal of Computer Science and Information Technology 3.1 (2024): 24-31.
  13. AGOR, Augustina Dede, et al. Mobile Ad-Hoc Networks: A Classification System for Routing Protocols. International Journal of Communication Networks and Information Security, 2024, 16.2: 1-11.‏
  14. Yoshimura, Yuji, et al. "Analysis of visitors’ mobility patterns through random walk in the Louvre Museum." Journal of Ambient Intelligence and Humanized Computing (2024): 1-16.
  15. SANTHI, G. B., et al. Traffic coordination by reducing jamming attackers in VANET using probabilistic Manhattan Grid Topology for automobile applications. Scientific reports, 2024, 14.1: 8365.
  16. ALILOU, Mahmoud, et al. QFS-RPL: mobility and energy aware multi path routing protocol for the internet of mobile things data transfer infrastructures. Telecommunication Systems, 2024, 85.2: 289-312.
  17. WANG, Ning, et al. Transmission reliability evaluation of the wireless mobile ad hoc network considering the routing protocol and randomness of channel capacity. Quality and Reliability Engineering International, 2024, 40.1: 664-680.‏
  18. SAHU, Neetu; VEENADHARI, S. A Comprehensive Survey of Load Balancing Techniques in Multipath Energy-Consuming Routing Protocols for Wireless Ad hoc Networks in MANET. Indian Journal of Data Communication and Networking (IJDCN), 2024, 4.4: 5-10.
  19. DAK, Ahmad Yusri, et al. Performance Analysis of Non-Realistic Routing Protocol using Random Waypoint Model in MANET. AIUB Journal of Science and Engineering (AJSE), 2024, 23.1: 79-83.
  20. DEWANGAN, Kailash P., et al. An efficient node localization and failure node detection in the MANET environment. Telecommunication Systems, 2024, 85.2: 313-329.‏‏
  21. Adanigboa, O. O., Ainab, S., Oluwarantic, A. I., & Oseni, S. O. Advances in Energy Efficiency and Routing Optimization in Mobile Ad Hoc Networks: A Comprehensive Literature Review.‏
  22. Shujairi, M. (2025). Developing IoT Performance in Healthcare through the Integration of Machine Learning and Software-Defined Networking (SDN). Babylonian Journal of Internet of Things, 2025, 77-88.‏
  23. Yang, C., & Li, B. (2025). SDN-DRLTE Algorithm Based on DRL in Computer Network Traffic Control. Informatica, 49(13).‏
  24. Rahman, A., Eidmum, M. D., Kundu, D., Hossain, M., Tashrif, M. D., Karim, M. A., & Islam, M. J. (2024). Distb-vnet: Distributed cluster-based blockchain vehicular ad-hoc networks through sdn-nfv for smart city. arXiv preprint arXiv:2412.04222.‏
  25. AL-JARAH, R.; KASHMOLA, M. Y. Modeling the Power Grid Network of Iraq. Baghdad Science Journal, 2023, 20(3): 879.
  26. Kumar, V., and S. Singla. "A performance analysis of MANET routing protocols." Int J Eng Technolmanag Sci (2022).
  27. Onuora, Augustine Chidiebere, Eyo Edmund Essien, and Prince Ana. "A Comprehensive Review of Routing Protocols for Mobile Ad Hoc Networks (Manets)." International Journal of Information System and Computer Science (IJISCS) Vol 6 (2022): 1-13.
  28. Nemade, Chetana Hemant, and Uma Pujeri. "Comparative study and performance analysis of MANET routing protocol." International journal of electrical and computer engineering systems 14.2 (2023): 145-154.
  29. Fazio, Peppino, Miralem Mehic, and Miroslav Voznak. "Effects of sampling frequency on node mobility prediction in dynamic networks: A spectral view." Digital Communications and Networks 9.4 (2023): 1009-1022.
  30. Wang, Zifei, and Mingchuan Zhang. "Review of Routing Protocols for Mobile Ad Hoc Networks." International Journal of Computer Science and Information Technology 3.1 (2024): 24-31.
  31. AHMED, I. M.; KASHMOOLA, M. Y. CCF based system framework in federated learning against data poisoning attacks. Journal of Applied Science and Engineering, 2022, 26(7): 971-979.