Implementation of Augmented Reality (AR) for Training CNC TU-3A Milling Machine Operators

Abstract

The development of technology and the demands of Industry 4.0 in the present era are causing transformations in training and learning methods. These include the practice of production processes in training for computer numerical control (CNC) machine operator TU-3A. Despite the significant contribution, time constraints often hinder the effectiveness of training activities during practical sessions. Therefore, this research aimed to develop an Augmented Reality (AR) application to support practical training in production processes. The application was designed to provide instructions or basic training in operating the CNC machine TU-3A using the Unity platform and Vuforia Engine with the ground plane method. The design enabled the visualization of 3D model of the CNC machine TU-3A and data were obtained using quantitative methods. The results showed that the System Usability Scale (SUS) testing on AR CNC application, conducted through a questionnaire with 40 respondents, obtained a final SUS score of 71.13. This suggested that the AR CNC application was suitable for implementation as a supplementary medium for training/learning the fundamentals of operating the CNC machine TU-3A.

Country : Indonesia

1 P. Paryanto2 S.A. Widyanto3 K.B. Setiawan

  1. Mechanical Engineering Department, Diponegoro University, Jl. Prof Soedarto SH Tembalang, Semarang, Indonesia
  2. Mechanical Engineering Department, Diponegoro University, Jl. Prof Soedarto SH Tembalang, Semarang, Indonesia
  3. Mechanical Engineering Department, Diponegoro University, Jl. Prof Soedarto SH Tembalang, Semarang, Indonesia

IRJIET, Volume 9, Issue 5, May 2025 pp. 14-22

doi.org/10.47001/IRJIET/2025.905002

References

  1. S. Ceder, Augmented reality technology, no. 17. 2019. doi: 10.4324/9781351044196-11.
  2. D. Rohendi, S. Septian, and H. Sutarno, “The Use of Geometry Learning Media Based on Augmented Reality for Junior High School Students,” IOP Conf. Ser. Mater. Sci. Eng., vol. 306, no. 1, 2018, doi: 10.1088/1757-899X/306/1/012029.
  3. L. Damiani, M. Demartini, G. Guizzi, R. Revetria, and F. Tonelli, “Augmented and virtual reality applications in industrial systems: A qualitative review towards the industry 4.0 era,” IFAC-PapersOnLine, vol. 51, no. 11, pp. 624–630, 2018, doi: 10.1016/j.ifacol.2018.08.388.
  4. J. Jetter, J. Eimecke, and A. Rese, “Augmented reality tools for industrial applications: What are potential key performance indicators and who benefits?,” Comput. Human Behav., vol. 87, pp. 18–33, 2018, doi: 10.1016/j.chb.2018.04.054.
  5. N. J. Harahap, “Mahasiswa Dan Revolusi Industri 4.0,” Ecobisma (Jurnal Ekon. Bisnis Dan Manajemen), vol. 6, no. 1, pp. 70–78, 2019, doi: 10.36987/ecobi.v6i1.38.
  6. N. J. Harahap and M. Rafika, “Industrial Revolution 4.0: and the Impact on Human Resources,” Ecobisma (Jurnal Ekon. Bisnis Dan Manajemen), vol. 7, no. 1, pp. 89–96, 2020, doi: 10.36987/ecobi.v7i1.1545.
  7. J. Jwo, C. Lin, and C. Lee, “Smart technology – driven aspects for human-in-the-loop smart manufacturing,” no. 2021, pp. 1741–1752, 2021.
  8. E. Kaasinen et al., “Empowering and engaging industrial workers with Operator 4.0 solutions,” Comput. Ind. Eng., vol. 139, no. xxxx, p. 105678, 2020, doi: 10.1016/j.cie.2019.01.052.
  9. J. Kim, M. Lorenz, S. Knopp, and P. Klimant, “Industrial Augmented Reality: Concepts and User Interface Designs for Augmented Reality Maintenance Worker Support Systems,” Adjun. Proc. 2020 IEEE Int. Symp. Mix. Augment. Reality, ISMAR-Adjunct 2020, pp. 67–69, 2020, doi: 10.1109/ISMAR-Adjunct51615.2020.00032.
  10. S. Nidhra, “Black Box and White Box Testing Techniques - A Literature Review,” Int. J. Embed. Syst. Appl., vol. 2, no. 2, pp. 29–50, 2012, doi: 10.5121/ijesa.2012.2204.
  11. A.M. Wichansky, “Usability testing in 2000 and beyond,” Ergonomics, vol. 43, no. 7, pp. 998–1006, 2000, doi: 10.1080/001401300409170.
  12. M. Romilly, “12 Best Augmented Reality SDKs,” Dzone IoT. p. 1, 2019. [Online]. Available: https://dzone.com/articles/12-best-augmented-reality-sdks
  13. P. M. Jacob and M. Prasanna, “A Comparative analysis on Black box testing strategies,” Proc. - 2016 Int. Conf. Inf. Sci. ICIS 2016, pp. 1–6, 2017, doi: 10.1109/INFOSCI.2016.7845290.
  14. J. Brooke, “SUS: A Retrospective,” no. June, 2013.