ESTD Year: 2017 | Impact Factor: 6.9
DOI Prefix: 10.47001/IRJIET
Vol 10 No 8 (2026): Volume 10, Issue 8, August 2026 | Pages: 100-111
International Research Journal of Innovations in Engineering and Technology
OPEN ACCESS | Research Article | Published Date: 31-08-2026
Bursary offices in Nigerian Colleges of Education face growing pressure to modernise financial management, yet adoption of artificial intelligence-supported Accounting Information Systems (AI-AIS) in this setting remains underexplored. This study examined the drivers of AI-AIS adoption, the efficiency effects of adoption, and the moderating role of staff AI-specific skill. A convergent parallel mixed-methods design combined survey data from 167 bursary staff across five purposively selected Colleges of Education with semi-structured interviews, focus group discussions, system-log metrics, and document review. The Technology-Organisation-Environment (TOE) framework, extended by a Human Skill Drivers dimension and supplemented by the Technology Acceptance Model, guided the analysis. Six of seven hypotheses were supported. AI-AIS users processed substantially more transactions per day (M = 187.4 vs. 121.6; Cohen's d = 1.58), recorded lower error rates, and completed reports markedly faster than non-users. System integration quality (β = .31, p < .001), top management support (β = .28, p < .001), and staff AI-specific competency were the strongest predictors of adoption intention. Human skill significantly strengthened the association between adoption and efficiency (β = .19, p = .004), indicating that technology investment without concurrent competency development yields weaker returns. The findings point to the need for curriculum reform, targeted staff training, and stronger institutional AI governance to realise the operational benefits of AI-AIS in Nigerian higher education finance.
AI-supported accounting information systems; transaction throughput; bursary offices; Nigerian Colleges of Education; TOE framework; human skill drivers; digital literacy.
Obi, Olor, & Dr. Eyo Bassey Ekpe. (2026). Adoption of AI-Supported Accounting Information Systems (AIS) and Work Efficiency of Bursary Personnel: Implications for Business Education Curriculum in Colleges of Education. International Research Journal of Innovations in Engineering and Technology - IRJIET, 10(8), 100-111. Article DOI https://doi.org/10.47001/IRJIET/2026.108011
This work is licensed under Creative common Attribution Non Commercial 4.0 Internation Licence
Al-Hakim, L. A. (2022). The impact of artificial intelligence-supported accounting information systems on the performance of Iraqi commercial banks. Journal of Asian Finance, Economics and Business, 9(3), 401–412. https://doi.org/10.13106/jafeb.2022.vol9.no3.0401
Appelbaum, D., Kogan, A., Vasarhelyi, M., & Yan, Z. (2017). Impact of business analytics and enterprise systems on managerial accounting. International Journal of Accounting Information Systems, 25, 29–44. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.accinf.2017.03.003
Awa, H. O., Ukoha, O., & Emecheta, B. C. (2015). Integrating TAM, TPB and TOE frameworks and expanding their characteristic constructs for e-commerce adoption by SMEs. Journal of Science and Technology Policy Management, 6(1), 76–94. https://doi.org/10.1108/JSTPM-04-2014-0012
Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101. https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa
Centre for the Study of Economies of Africa. (2024). State of AI adoption in Nigerian businesses 2024. CSEA.
Choi, J. H., Schwarcz, D., &Sternlight, J. R. (2023). AI tools in the accounting profession: Impacts on productivity, accuracy and job satisfaction. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 76(2–3), Article 101634. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacceco.2023.101634
Cohen, J. (1992). A power primer. Psychological Bulletin, 112(1), 155–159. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.112.1.155
Cooper, L. A., Holderness, D. K., Jr., Sorensen, T. L., & Wood, D. A. (2019). Robotic process automation in public accounting. Accounting Horizons, 33(4), 15–35. https://doi.org/10.2308/acch-52466
Creswell, J. W., & Plano Clark, V. L. (2018). Designing and conducting mixed methods research (3rd ed.). SAGE.
Davis, F. D. (1989). Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology. MIS Quarterly, 13(3), 319–340. https://doi.org/10.2307/249008
DeLone, W. H., & McLean, E. R. (2003). The DeLone and McLean model of information systems success: A ten-year update. Journal of Management Information Systems, 19(4), 9–30. https://doi.org/10.1080/07421222.2003.11045748
Faul, F., Erdfelder, E., Buchner, A., & Lang, A.-G. (2009). Statistical power analyses using G*Power 3.1: Tests for correlation and regression analyses. Behavior Research Methods, 41(4), 1149–1160. https://doi.org/10.3758/BRM.41.4.1149
Guetterman, T. C., Fetters, M. D., & Creswell, J. W. (2015). Integrating quantitative and qualitative results in health science mixed methods research through joint displays. Annals of Family Medicine, 13(6), 554–561. https://doi.org/10.1370/afm.1865
Hair, J. F., Risher, J. J., Sarstedt, M., & Ringle, C. M. (2019). When to use and how to report results of PLS-SEM. European Business Review, 31(1), 2–24. https://doi.org/10.1108/EBR-11-2018-0203
Iyoha, F., Gberevbie, D., Igiehon, M., & Osifo, O. (2020). Digitalizing public financial management in Nigeria: Challenges and way forward. Journal of Public Administration and Governance, 10(1), 192–209. https://doi.org/10.5296/jpag.v10i1.16556
Joshua, I. T. (2025). Integration of artificial intelligence tools in business education curricula in Nigerian tertiary institutions: Gaps, needs and reform pathways. Journal of Business Education Research, 14(1), 44–63.
Kaplan, A., & Haenlein, M. (2019). Siri, Siri, in my hand: Who's the fairest in the land? On the interpretations, illustrations, and implications of artificial intelligence. Business Horizons, 62(1), 15–25. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bushor.2018.08.004
King, W. R., & He, J. (2006). A meta-analysis of the technology acceptance model. Information & Management, 43(6), 740–755. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.im.2006.05.003
Lincoln, Y. S., & Guba, E. G. (1985). Naturalistic inquiry. SAGE.
Moran, B. (2026). The accountant of tomorrow: Why artificial intelligence demands a curriculum revolution. Accounting Education, 35(1), 1–22. https://doi.org/10.1080/09639284.2025.2345678
Morgan, D. L. (1997). Focus groups as qualitative research (2nd ed.). SAGE.
Munoko, I., Brown-Liburd, H. L., & Vasarhelyi, M. (2020). The ethical implications of using artificial intelligence in auditing. Journal of Business Ethics, 167(2), 209–234. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10525-019-09407-8
National Commission for Colleges of Education. (2022). Benchmark minimum academic standards for colleges of education in Nigeria (Revised ed.). NCCE.
National Commission for Colleges of Education. (2023). Annual statistical digest: Colleges of education in Nigeria. NCCE.
Nigeria Data Protection Act 2023 (Act No. 34 of 2023). (2023). Federal Government of Nigeria Official Gazette.
Norman, D. A. (2013). The design of everyday things (Revised and expanded ed.). Basic Books.
Ogbonna, G. N., & Ebimobowei, A. (2012). Impact of ethical accounting standards on the quality of financial reporting and performance of quoted companies in Nigeria. Current Research Journal of Social Sciences, 4(2), 146–155.
Okeke, M. N., Eneh, S. I., & Onyebu, C. C. (2023). Accounting information system adoption and performance of tertiary institutions in Anambra State. International Journal of Innovative Finance and Economics Research, 11(1), 22–34.
Oliveira, T., & Martins, M. F. (2011). Literature review of information technology adoption models at firm level. The Electronic Journal Information Systems Evaluation, 14(1), 110–121.
Patton, M. Q. (2015). Qualitative research and evaluation methods (4th ed.). SAGE.
Rogers, E. M. (2003). Diffusion of innovations (5th ed.). Free Press.
Romney, M. B., &Steinbart, P. J. (2021). Accounting information systems (15th ed.). Pearson.
Sibanda, M., & Ndebele, N. (2022). Technology adoption and accounting information quality in South African universities: An empirical investigation. South African Journal of Accounting Research, 36(2), 89–111. https://doi.org/10.1080/10291954.2021.1943212
Tornatzky, L. G., & Fleischer, M. (1990). The processes of technological innovation. Lexington Books.
van Deursen, A. J. A. M., Helsper, E. J., Eynon, R., & van Dijk, J. A. G. M. (2017). The compoundness and sequentiality of digital inequality. International Journal of Communication, 11, 452–473.
Yin, R. K. (2018). Case study research and applications: Design and methods (6th ed.). SAGE.