Design Methodology of a Dual-Medium Propeller Using BET

Hritika ChafekarDepartment of Mechanical Engineering, All India Shri Shivaji Memorial Society’s College of Engineering, Pune, Maharashtra, IndiaPrasad GonewarDepartment of Mechanical Engineering, All India Shri Shivaji Memorial Society’s College of Engineering, Pune, Maharashtra, IndiaKaran KunteDepartment of Mechanical Engineering, All India Shri Shivaji Memorial Society’s College of Engineering, Pune, Maharashtra, IndiaDheeraj KambleDepartment of Mechanical Engineering, All India Shri Shivaji Memorial Society’s College of Engineering, Pune, Maharashtra, IndiaDr. Sunil PatilDepartment of Mechanical Engineering, All India Shri Shivaji Memorial Society’s College of Engineering, Pune, Maharashtra, India

Vol 10 No 6 (2026): Volume 10, Issue 6, June 2026 | Pages: 266-276

International Research Journal of Innovations in Engineering and Technology

OPEN ACCESS | Research Article | Published Date: 27-06-2026

doi Logo doi.org/10.47001/IRJIET/2026.106034

Abstract

Hybrid aerial-underwater vehicles (HAUVs) require propulsion systems capable of operating efficiently in two fluids with significantly different physical properties. Conventional solutions typically employ separate propulsion systems for aerial and underwater operation, increasing system complexity, weight, and power consumption. This work presents the design methodology and numerical investigation of a dual-medium propeller intended for operation in both air and water. The propeller geometry was developed using Blade Element Theory (BET) combined with aerofoil performance data obtained from the NACA 4412 profile. Analytical predictions of thrust and torque were used to establish the blade chord and twist distributions, while computational fluid dynamics (CFD) simulations were performed to assess the aerodynamic and hydrodynamic behaviour of the final geometry.

A steady Reynolds-Averaged Navier–Stokes (RANS) formulation with the SST k–ω turbulence model was employed to evaluate propeller performance in both operating media. Structural calculations were conducted to provide a first-order assessment of bending, torsional, and centrifugal stresses acting on the blade. Results indicate that the proposed design methodology produces a propeller capable of generating useful thrust in both air and water while maintaining acceptable preliminary structural integrity. The study establishes a framework for dual medium propeller development and provides a foundation for future experimental validation and optimisation.

Keywords

Dual-medium propeller, hybrid aerial underwater vehicle, Blade Element Theory, computational fluid dynamics, NACA 4412, propeller design.


Citation of this Article

Hritika Chafekar, Prasad Gonewar, Karan Kunte, Dheeraj Kamble, & Dr. Sunil Patil. (2026). Design Methodology of a Dual-Medium Propeller Using BET. International Research Journal of Innovations in Engineering and Technology - IRJIET, 10(6), 266-276. Article DOI https://doi.org/10.47001/IRJIET/2026.106034

References
F. M. White, Fluid Mechanics, 9th ed., New York, NY, USA: McGrawHill, 2021.

D. S. Drew, “Fluid-boundary transit mechanics for cross-domain robotic platforms,” IEEE Robotics and Automation Letters, vol. 2, no. 4, pp. 2101–2108, Oct. 2017.

R. Siddall and M. Kovac, “Submersible Unmanned Aerial Vehicles: Design challenges and state-of-the-art,” Robotics and Autonomous Systems, vol. 62, no. 9, pp. 1350–1361, Sep. 2014.

F. E. Weick, Aircraft Propeller Design, New York, NY, USA: McGrawHill, 1930.

D. Lu, L. Zhou, and T. Wang, “Morphing and adaptive blade profiles for mixed-medium aquatic propulsion,” Journal of Fluids and Structures, vol. 95, p. 102980, May 2020.

X. Dang, Y. J. Jiang, and H. C. Chen, “Optimization design of a dual-medium propeller for hybrid aerial-underwater vehicles,” Ocean Engineering, vol. 245, p. 110432, Feb. 2022.

M. Maier and P. F. Schmidt, “Aerodynamic and structural boundaries of fixed-wing trans-media vehicle flight,” Aerospace Science and Technology, vol. 112, p. 106612, May 2021.

Mercado, E. J. Lopez, and C. R. Garcia, “Multirotor design constraints for sub-aerial atmospheric deployment,” Journal of Intelligent & Robotic Systems, vol. 94, no. 2, pp. 411–427, Jun. 2019.

O. Gur, “Aerofoil importance for propeller optimized design,” in Proceedings of the 56th 3AF International Conference on Applied Aerodynamics, 2011, pp. 45–52.

J. D. Anderson, Fundamentals of Aerodynamics, 6th ed., New York, NY, USA: McGraw-Hill, 2017.

H. Glauert, “Airplane Propellers,” in Aerodynamic Theory, W. F. Durand, Ed. Berlin, Germany: Springer, 1935, pp. 169–360.

J. G. Leishman, Principles of Helicopter Aerodynamics, 2nd ed. New York, NY, USA: Cambridge University Press, 2006.

H. K. Versteeg and W. Malalasekera, An Introduction to Computational Fluid Dynamics: The Finite Volume Method, 2nd ed., London, U.K.: Pearson, 2007.

F. R. Menter, “Two-equation eddy-viscosity turbulence models for engineering applications,” AIAA Journal, vol. 32, no. 8, pp. 1598–1605, Aug. 1994.

Y. Zhang, L. Zhou, and X. Wang, “Numerical investigation of propeller aerodynamic performance using overset mesh techniques,” Aerospace Science and Technology, vol. 118, p. 106981, Nov. 2021.

ANSYS Inc., ANSYS Fluent Theory Guide, Release 2021 R1, Canonsburg, PA, USA, 2021.

F. C. Campbell, Structural Composite Materials, Materials Park, OH, USA: ASM International, 2010.

Asahi Kasei Corp., Leona PA6-CF40 Technical Datasheet: Short Carbon Fiber Reinforced Structural Polyamide Properties, Tokyo, Japan, 2022.

Laidani, M. S. Khan, and R. G. S. Johnston, “Development of a low cost thruster characterization test bench,” Journal of Marine Engineering & Technology, vol. 19, no. 3, pp. 142–151, Jul. 2020.