Optimized LSTM–GWO Framework for Intelligent Email Spam Filtering in 5G Networks

Ali Mohammed Al-QuraishiDepartment of Computer Science, College of Education, Sheikh Al-Tusi University, Najaf-Iraq

Vol 10 No 9 (2026): Volume 10, Issue 9, September 2026 | Pages: 70-82

International Research Journal of Innovations in Engineering and Technology

OPEN ACCESS | Research Article | Published Date: 20-09-2026

doi Logo doi.org/10.47001/IRJIET/2026.109008

Abstract

This article is a comparison study revolving around machine learning and deep learning algorithms which have been applied in the spam email detection process with a particular focus on population based optimization algorithms. The comparison was also made between the traditional classifiers such as Logistic Regression, SVM, KNN, Decision Tree, Random Forest, Naive Bayes and K-Means with the deep learning networks such as LSTM, GRU, CNN and Dense networks. Systematic use of grey wolf optimizer (GWO), genetic algorithm (GA) and particle swarm optimization (PSO) optimization algorithms was applied to enhance the performance of models. The deep learning models have been determined to perform better than the traditional classifiers on a range of metrics, including the accuracy, recall, F1-score, MCC, Cohen Kappa and specificity. The performance of LSTM optimized by GA and GWO were the best and yielded a higher accuracy between 97.9, 96.7, and F1-score of 0.973. PSO not only improved CNN and Dense models but also gave the best traditional model, Accuracy of 97.5 percent and F1-score of 0.974. The findings reveal that deep learning and population-based optimizers. can be applied to design powerful and competent email spam detectors in the field.

Keywords

Email Spam, Deep learning, Machine Learning, Optimizer Algorithms


Citation of this Article

Ali Mohammed Al-Quraishi. (2026). Optimized LSTM–GWO Framework for Intelligent Email Spam Filtering in 5G Networks. International Research Journal of Innovations in Engineering and Technology - IRJIET, 10(9), 70-82. Article DOI https://doi.org/10.47001/IRJIET/2026.109008

References
  1. E. H. Tusher, M. A. Ismail, M. A. Rahman, A. H. Alenezi, and M. Uddin, “Email Spam: A Comprehensive Review of Optimize Detection Methods, Challenges, and Open Research Problems,” IEEE Access, vol. 12, pp. 143627–143657, 2024.
  2. D. W. K. Khong, “AN ECONOMIC ANALYSIS OF SPAM LAW,” vol. 1, no. February, pp. 23–45, 2004.
  3. R. Tanti, “Study of Phishing Attack and their Prevention Techniques,” Interantional J. Sci. Res. Eng. Manag., vol. 08, no. 10, pp. 1–8, 2024.
  4. E. Altulaihan, A. Alismail, M. M. Hafizur Rahman, and A. A. Ibrahim, “Email Security Issues, Tools, and Techniques Used in Investigation,” Sustain., vol. 15, no. 13, 2023.
  5. H. N. Fakhouri, S. Alawadi, F. M. Awaysheh, I. B. Hani, M. Alkhalaileh, and F. Hamad, “A Comprehensive Study on the Role of Machine Learning in 5G Security: Challenges, Technologies, and Solutions,” Electron., vol. 12, no. 22, pp. 1–44, 2023.
  6. I.Malashin, V. Tynchenko, A. Gantimurov, V. Nelyub, and A. Borodulin, “Applications of Long Short-Term Memory (LSTM) Networks in Polymeric Sciences: A Review,” Polymers, vol. 16, no. 18. 2024.
  7. N. Khaledian, K. Khamforoosh, R. Akraminejad, L. Abualigah, and D. Javaheri, “An energy-efficient and deadline-aware workflow scheduling algorithm in the fog and cloud environment,” computing, pp. 1–29, 2023.
  8. N. Kumar, S. Sonowal, and Nishant, “Email Spam Detection Using Machine Learning Algorithms,” Proc. 2nd Int. Conf. Inven. Res. Comput. Appl. ICIRCA 2020, no. September, pp. 108–113, 2020.
  9. A.Junnarkar, S. Adhikari, J. Fagania, P. Chimurkar, and D. Karia, E-Mail Spam Classification via Machine Learning and Natural Language Processing. 2021.
  10. F. Zhang, P. P. K. Chan, B. Biggio, D. S. Yeung, and F. Roli, “Adversarial Feature Selection Against Evasion Attacks,” IEEE Trans. Cybern., vol. 46, no. 3, pp. 766–777, 2016.
  11. K. Shaukat, S. Luo, S. Chen, and D. Liu, “Cyber Threat Detection Using Machine Learning Techniques: A Performance Evaluation Perspective,” 1st Annu. Int. Conf. Cyber Warf. Secur. ICCWS 2020 - Proc., no. October, 2020.
  12. P. Hajek, A. Barushka, and M. Munk, “Fake consumer review detection using deep neural networks integrating word embeddings and emotion mining,” Neural Comput. Appl., vol. 32, no. 23, pp. 17259–17274, Dec. 2020.
  13. V. Ramanathan and H. Wechsler, “Phishing detection and impersonated entity discovery using Conditional Random Field and Latent Dirichlet Allocation,” Comput. Secur., vol. 34, pp. 123–139, May 2013.
  14. A.Ghourabi, M. A. Mahmood, and Q. M. Alzubi, “A hybrid CNN-LSTM model for SMS spam detection in arabic and english messages,” Futur. Internet, vol. 12, no. 9, pp. 1–16, 2020.
  15. M. V. Madhavan, S. Pande, P. Umekar, T. Mahore, and D. Kalyankar, “Comparative analysis of detection of email spam with the aid of machine learning approaches,” IOP Conf. Ser. Mater. Sci. Eng., vol. 1022, no. 1, 2021.
  16. A.Rayan, “Analysis of e-Mail Spam Detection Using a Novel Machine Learning-Based Hybrid Bagging Technique,” Comput. Intell. Neurosci., vol. 2022, no. August, 2022.