Thermal Efficiency Analysis and Economic Feasibility of Using B40 Biodiesel in a 140 MW Dual-Fuel Engine at a Gas-Powered Power Plant (PLTMG)

Galvani RepiMaster of Energy Study Program, Graduate School, Diponegoro University, Semarang, 50241, IndonesiaWidayatMaster of Energy Study Program, Graduate School, Diponegoro University, Semarang, 50241, IndonesiaSri Widodo Agung SuedyMaster of Energy Study Program, Graduate School, Diponegoro University, Semarang, 50241, Indonesia

Vol 10 No 6 (2026): Volume 10, Issue 6, June 2026 | Pages: 318-322

International Research Journal of Innovations in Engineering and Technology

OPEN ACCESS | Research Article | Published Date: 30-06-2026

doi Logo doi.org/10.47001/IRJIET/2026.106038

Abstract

Global energy transition and Indonesia's biodiesel mandate require comprehensive technical and economic analysis of B40 biodiesel implementation in large-scale power generation. This study analyzes the thermal efficiency, technical implications, and economic feasibility of B40 biodiesel use in a 140 MW Dual-Fuel Engine at a Gas Engine Power Plant (PLTMG). Field testing was conducted on 14 generator units under load variations of 7 MW, 8 MW, and 9 MW, comparing B40 performance against B0 and B35 baselines. Results show that B40 improves thermal efficiency at low-to-medium loads (+0.87 pp at 7 MW, +0.28 pp at 8 MW) due to the internal oxidizer mechanism of intrinsic FAME oxygen (~11% wt), with peak efficiency of 42.71% at 8 MW (the "sweet spot"). A trade-off occurs at 9 MW peak load where efficiency decreases (-0.57 pp) due to heat transfer loss dominance. Emission testing at 9 MW confirmed B40 reduces PM by 11.9% and CO by 4.0% compared to B35, while NOx increases moderately (+2.5%) but remains 25.3% below Permen LHK P.15/2019 limits (compliance probability: 98.7%). All fuel system materials proven compatible without major modification. Economic analysis shows B40 LCOE at $0.0857/kWh, only 1.78% higher than B0, with efficiency benefits and carbon credits ($151,200/year) offsetting 70% of the price premium. The break-even point is reached at a 1.2% premium. B40 is feasible for sustainable implementation at 60–66% load range with condition-based maintenance strategy.

Keywords

B40 biodiesel; dual-fuel engine; thermal efficiency; LCOE; exhaust gas emissions; normalized SFC.


Citation of this Article

Galvani Repi, Widayat, & Sri Widodo Agung Suedy. (2026). Thermal Efficiency Analysis and Economic Feasibility of Using B40 Biodiesel in a 140 MW Dual-Fuel Engine at a Gas-Powered Power Plant (PLTMG). International Research Journal of Innovations in Engineering and Technology - IRJIET, 10(6), 318-322. Article DOI https://doi.org/10.47001/IRJIET/2026.106038

References
Çalık, A. (2024). Exploring the efficiency and emission characteristics of hydroxy-boosted canola biodiesel in comparison to traditional diesel fuels. Frontiers in Energy Research, 12, 1386440. https://doi.org/10.3389/fenrg.2024.1386440

Elgharbawy, AS, Osman, AI, El Demerdash, AGM, Sadik, WA, Kasaby, MA, & Ali, SE (2024). Enhancing biodiesel production efficiency with industrial waste-derived catalysts: Techno-economic analysis. Energy Conversion and Management, 321, 118945.

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enconman.2024.118945

Heywood, J. B. (2018). Internal combustion engine fundamentals (2nd ed.). McGraw-Hill Education.

Ministry of Energy and Mineral Resources. (2025). To achieve energy security, the Minister of Energy and Mineral Resources mandates B40 to take effect on January 1, 2025. https://www.esdm.go.id

Knothe, G. (2010). Biodiesel and renewable diesel: A comprehensive review. Springer Science & Business Media.

Laguado-Ramírez, R., Hernandez-Villamizar, F., & Duarte-Forero, J. (2024). Comparative assessment of emissions, performance, and economic parameters for a dual-fuel diesel generator operating with rice bran biodiesel and hydrogen. Heliyon, 10(11), e32109. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e32109

Rahman, MM, Kalam, MA, & Masjuki, HH (2021). A review of the development and performance evaluation of dual-fuel compression ignition engines. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 137, 110455. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2020.110455

Sullivan, J. M., & Neff, M. (2016). Engineering economics: A life cycle cost approach (5th ed.). McGraw-Hill Education.

Tambarta, E., Sinta, I., Nasution, WI, Safitri, S., & Arnas, E. (2025). Study of the potential of plantation commodities as biodiesel raw materials for renewable energy development. Agriuma Journal, 7(1). https://doi.org/10.31289/agri.v7i1.13230

Zhang, Y., Wang, Z., & Chen, X. (2022). Emissions and performance analysis of natural gas/diesel dual-fuel engines under various operating strategies. Fuel, 315, 123228. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fuel.2021.123228