ESTD Year: 2017 | Impact Factor (2026): 8.7
DOI Prefix: 10.47001/IRJIET
Vol 10 No 6 (2026): Volume 10, Issue 6, June 2026 | Pages: 318-322
International Research Journal of Innovations in Engineering and Technology
OPEN ACCESS | Research Article | Published Date: 30-06-2026
Global energy transition and Indonesia's biodiesel mandate require comprehensive technical and economic analysis of B40 biodiesel implementation in large-scale power generation. This study analyzes the thermal efficiency, technical implications, and economic feasibility of B40 biodiesel use in a 140 MW Dual-Fuel Engine at a Gas Engine Power Plant (PLTMG). Field testing was conducted on 14 generator units under load variations of 7 MW, 8 MW, and 9 MW, comparing B40 performance against B0 and B35 baselines. Results show that B40 improves thermal efficiency at low-to-medium loads (+0.87 pp at 7 MW, +0.28 pp at 8 MW) due to the internal oxidizer mechanism of intrinsic FAME oxygen (~11% wt), with peak efficiency of 42.71% at 8 MW (the "sweet spot"). A trade-off occurs at 9 MW peak load where efficiency decreases (-0.57 pp) due to heat transfer loss dominance. Emission testing at 9 MW confirmed B40 reduces PM by 11.9% and CO by 4.0% compared to B35, while NOx increases moderately (+2.5%) but remains 25.3% below Permen LHK P.15/2019 limits (compliance probability: 98.7%). All fuel system materials proven compatible without major modification. Economic analysis shows B40 LCOE at $0.0857/kWh, only 1.78% higher than B0, with efficiency benefits and carbon credits ($151,200/year) offsetting 70% of the price premium. The break-even point is reached at a 1.2% premium. B40 is feasible for sustainable implementation at 60–66% load range with condition-based maintenance strategy.
B40 biodiesel; dual-fuel engine; thermal efficiency; LCOE; exhaust gas emissions; normalized SFC.
Galvani Repi, Widayat, & Sri Widodo Agung Suedy. (2026). Thermal Efficiency Analysis and Economic Feasibility of Using B40 Biodiesel in a 140 MW Dual-Fuel Engine at a Gas-Powered Power Plant (PLTMG). International Research Journal of Innovations in Engineering and Technology - IRJIET, 10(6), 318-322. Article DOI https://doi.org/10.47001/IRJIET/2026.106038
This work is licensed under Creative common Attribution Non Commercial 4.0 Internation Licence
Elgharbawy, AS, Osman, AI, El Demerdash, AGM, Sadik, WA, Kasaby, MA, & Ali, SE (2024). Enhancing biodiesel production efficiency with industrial waste-derived catalysts: Techno-economic analysis. Energy Conversion and Management, 321, 118945.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enconman.2024.118945
Heywood, J. B. (2018). Internal combustion engine fundamentals (2nd ed.). McGraw-Hill Education.
Ministry of Energy and Mineral Resources. (2025). To achieve energy security, the Minister of Energy and Mineral Resources mandates B40 to take effect on January 1, 2025. https://www.esdm.go.id
Knothe, G. (2010). Biodiesel and renewable diesel: A comprehensive review. Springer Science & Business Media.
Laguado-Ramírez, R., Hernandez-Villamizar, F., & Duarte-Forero, J. (2024). Comparative assessment of emissions, performance, and economic parameters for a dual-fuel diesel generator operating with rice bran biodiesel and hydrogen. Heliyon, 10(11), e32109. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e32109
Rahman, MM, Kalam, MA, & Masjuki, HH (2021). A review of the development and performance evaluation of dual-fuel compression ignition engines. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 137, 110455. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2020.110455
Sullivan, J. M., & Neff, M. (2016). Engineering economics: A life cycle cost approach (5th ed.). McGraw-Hill Education.
Tambarta, E., Sinta, I., Nasution, WI, Safitri, S., & Arnas, E. (2025). Study of the potential of plantation commodities as biodiesel raw materials for renewable energy development. Agriuma Journal, 7(1). https://doi.org/10.31289/agri.v7i1.13230
Zhang, Y., Wang, Z., & Chen, X. (2022). Emissions and performance analysis of natural gas/diesel dual-fuel engines under various operating strategies. Fuel, 315, 123228. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fuel.2021.123228